Ruby

Ruby — CS2 Stats

CA76561199488896334[U:1:1528630606]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,525Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,291Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6580 of 29589 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRubyFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,291 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning55
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateLWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1
Aggression7.7
Utility5.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.5
Utility5.6
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time538ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy26.0%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 28.0% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–9
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9infernoWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA31181358%0.01
dust2S1812667%0.02
ancientC1661038%0.00
infernoD1531220%0.03
anubisS97278%0.03
nukeD72529%-0.03
cache32167%0.03
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

571Matches
53%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
94.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3057%1.3119.9
Anubis1362%1.4217.7
Inferno850%1.3818.5
Ancient743%1.1718.1
Dust2617%1.0315.3
Vertigo333%1.1217.3
Nuke20%1.1016.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
533msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
56.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
10.79HE damage / grenade
6.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1784% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0427%28 Aug
mirage13–70.0336%28 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0127%27 Aug
cache13–70.1024%27 Aug
dust213–80.0131%27 Aug
dust29–13-0.0017%27 Aug
dust213–10-0.028%27 Aug
ancient13–80.0213%27 Aug
dust213–40.0924%27 Aug
inferno11–130.0321%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0318%24 Aug
mirage13–40.0841%23 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0331%23 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0026%23 Aug
inferno11–130.0725%20 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0419%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0426%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0943%20 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0522%20 Aug
dust213–10.0944%17 Aug
mirage13–10.0520%17 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0239%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.080%16 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0333%16 Aug
cache1–13-0.110%16 Aug
ancient13–40.0242%16 Aug
inferno9–130.0336%16 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0031%15 Aug
anubis13–50.1123%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0219%15 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0317%14 Aug
dust213–110.0539%14 Aug
dust216–130.0637%13 Aug
ancient13–90.0422%13 Aug
ancient13–70.0639%13 Aug
dust213–110.0115%10 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0124%10 Aug
inferno4–130.0145%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0112%4 Aug
inferno11–130.0636%4 Aug
mirage16–130.0619%4 Aug
inferno9–130.0125%27 Jul
mirage13–90.0827%27 Jul
inferno9–40.0747%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.1027%27 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0627%27 Jul
dust210–130.0315%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0225%24 Jul
anubis13–90.0632%24 Jul
dust213–110.0126%24 Jul
inferno13–110.0826%24 Jul
ancient15–150.0231%23 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0821%19 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0120%19 Jul
cache13–30.1024%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0122%11 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0323%11 Jul
inferno13–100.0927%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0930%6 Jul
mirage15–150.0529%6 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0119%5 Jul
dust213–80.0517%5 Jul
inferno12–160.0218%5 Jul
anubis8–130.0118%5 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0935%26 Dec
ancient6–13-0.0430%25 Dec
inferno6–13-0.0229%22 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0531%19 Dec
inferno6–90.0461%17 Oct
mirage13–70.0123%1 Oct
ancient1–11-0.0225%27 Sept
inferno8–80.0137%27 Sept
nuke13–100.0127%25 Sept
mirage13–90.0229%23 Sept
dust213–30.0136%22 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0131%19 Sept
dust26–130.0624%19 Sept
overpass13–9-0.0215%12 Sept
mirage13–110.1026%12 Sept
ancient1–9-0.0840%6 Sept
mirage13–90.1332%19 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0036%25 Jun
ancient9–130.0522%22 May
dust213–40.0122%22 May
mirage8–130.0032%21 May
inferno2–70.0329%15 May
anubis13–90.0121%15 May
mirage11–130.0120%14 May
ancient10–130.0420%14 May
mirage13–80.0524%13 May
mirage13–50.1035%6 Nov
mirage8–130.0622%6 Nov
dust210–13-0.0620%3 Nov
anubis13–40.1033%2 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0530%27 Oct
ancient10–130.0724%27 Oct
dust213–110.0926%25 Oct
anubis13–70.0026%25 Oct
anubis13–90.0320%25 Oct
mirage8–13-0.0325%23 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →