greedy — CS2 Stats

76561199487529668[U:1:1527263940]

975Tracked matches43%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,125Purple band · top ~23.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14493 of 24200 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgreedyFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,125 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning50
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52471Last 10052%Win rateWLLWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression4.1
Utility5.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch5.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time534ms−129ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — mirage 13–0
130Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30161453%0.02
mirageB1991047%0.02
nukeB157847%0.01
ancientC135838%-0.01
cacheB137654%-0.01
anubisS76186%0.05
inferno32167%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches
47%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
80.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage743%1.3719.3
Ancient450%0.8411.5
Dust2450%1.2621.5
Inferno10%1.0618.0
Anubis1100%1.0814.0
Overpass1100%0.738.0
Cache10%0.477.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
539msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
8.24HE damage / grenade
9.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.487 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.8114% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–6-0.0118%29 Aug
cache12–160.0025%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.038%29 Aug
dust213–30.1822%26 Aug
ancient13–110.0114%26 Aug
cache13–7-0.0117%26 Aug
dust213–6-0.0113%26 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0220%26 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0312%24 Aug
mirage11–130.0221%24 Aug
mirage0–7-0.0713%23 Aug
dust28–130.0214%23 Aug
inferno13–30.0320%22 Aug
mirage13–00.1919%20 Aug
dust25–13-0.0417%20 Aug
anubis13–80.0717%20 Aug
dust212–160.0532%18 Aug
cache3–8-0.007%17 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0417%17 Aug
mirage13–20.1112%17 Aug
dust26–13-0.0316%17 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0621%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0814%16 Aug
inferno7–130.0423%16 Aug
dust29–130.0124%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0125%16 Aug
ancient13–60.0722%16 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0220%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0218%14 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0020%14 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0430%13 Aug
cache13–80.0013%13 Aug
dust213–90.0426%13 Aug
anubis16–140.0722%12 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0614%12 Aug
anubis13–100.0521%11 Aug
anubis8–130.0119%9 Aug
anubis13–40.0620%9 Aug
ancient13–110.1217%9 Aug
ancient4–130.0118%9 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0420%9 Aug
dust23–130.0427%9 Aug
mirage13–20.1512%9 Aug
nuke13–70.0418%8 Aug
dust213–11-0.0520%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0432%8 Aug
nuke13–70.1024%8 Aug
dust213–11-0.0317%7 Aug
nuke6–130.0016%7 Aug
dust213–6-0.0621%6 Aug
cache16–140.0423%5 Aug
dust213–80.0226%4 Aug
nuke13–70.0116%4 Aug
mirage13–100.0423%3 Aug
dust213–50.1016%3 Aug
dust213–50.1128%3 Aug
dust213–50.1232%3 Aug
nuke13–70.0621%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0410%3 Aug
dust24–13-0.0131%3 Aug
dust213–9-0.0216%3 Aug
dust211–130.0926%3 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0417%3 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0615%3 Aug
mirage13–50.0118%3 Aug
cache9–13-0.0216%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0311%3 Aug
cache1–13-0.0733%3 Aug
nuke9–130.0020%2 Aug
dust214–160.0823%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0427%2 Aug
nuke13–60.0613%2 Aug
cache6–13-0.0620%2 Aug
cache15–15-0.0320%1 Aug
nuke9–130.0318%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.0421%1 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0522%1 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0117%1 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0417%31 Jul
mirage4–13-0.076%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.0316%31 Jul
cache13–80.0111%30 Jul
ancient13–110.0218%30 Jul
cache13–9-0.0425%30 Jul
nuke13–30.0115%30 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0412%30 Jul
nuke12–2-0.0017%29 Jul
dust213–60.0019%29 Jul
dust213–70.0927%29 Jul
anubis13–30.0021%29 Jul
dust27–130.0131%29 Jul
cache13–50.0325%29 Jul
dust213–110.0529%28 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0625%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0032%28 Jul
dust213–5-0.0023%27 Jul
mirage13–100.0529%26 Jul
dust213–70.0527%26 Jul
cache13–30.0720%26 Jul
anubis13–100.0521%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →