2003 — CS2 Stats

76561199482864234[U:1:1522598506]✓ No bans

583Tracked matches56%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,161Blue band · top ~32.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#27023 of 42378 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 978 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG2003FACEITLevel 4 · 978 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,161 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning50
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56413Last 10056%Win rateWLWWTLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression4.9
Utility6.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.0
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time592ms−95ms
first ⅓ avg 687ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–3
130Biggest win — cache
9Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 10nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26141254%0.01
dust2B24131154%0.02
ancientA1710759%0.01
anubisA148657%0.01
infernoA106460%0.01
nukeD51420%-0.02
cache330100%0.06
poseidon110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches
46%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
81.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21060%1.2216.5
Mirage50%0.9216.4
Anubis450%1.2215.0
Inferno450%1.1212.5
Nuke2100%1.1418.0
Ancient10%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
590msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.31HE damage / grenade
21.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6514% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.0330%30 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0425%30 Aug
ancient13–30.1320%30 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0014%30 Aug
dust212–120.0417%29 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0518%29 Aug
dust212–12-0.0622%29 Aug
inferno13–100.1013%27 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0718%27 Aug
dust27–130.0213%27 Aug
ancient10–130.0219%27 Aug
anubis9–50.0331%26 Aug
mirage13–40.0414%26 Aug
dust215–150.0619%24 Aug
ancient13–50.0216%24 Aug
ancient13–20.0931%24 Aug
anubis6–5-0.0114%24 Aug
mirage16–130.0112%24 Aug
ancient12–16-0.104%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0121%23 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0416%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.0721%23 Aug
mirage14–160.0124%23 Aug
mirage10–130.0113%23 Aug
anubis13–60.0217%23 Aug
inferno2–8-0.039%23 Aug
ancient14–160.0113%22 Aug
ancient16–140.0413%22 Aug
anubis13–30.0926%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0216%21 Aug
dust28–13-0.0112%16 Aug
inferno16–130.0012%16 Aug
ancient10–130.0221%16 Aug
cache13–60.0517%16 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0227%16 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0225%15 Aug
mirage13–80.0121%15 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0318%15 Aug
ancient13–70.0822%15 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0817%11 Aug
anubis11–130.1227%11 Aug
anubis13–100.0211%11 Aug
mirage13–110.0222%10 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0419%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0015%9 Aug
inferno7–13-0.046%9 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0424%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0411%9 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0416%9 Aug
mirage13–30.079%9 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0012%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0317%6 Aug
inferno13–20.0413%6 Aug
dust213–70.0810%2 Aug
dust213–20.0311%30 Jul
dust213–7-0.0317%30 Jul
ancient13–70.0625%28 Jul
dust213–30.0819%28 Jul
mirage16–140.0120%28 Jul
inferno13–40.0318%27 Jul
dust213–160.0116%26 Jul
mirage13–80.0921%25 Jul
cache13–00.0720%25 Jul
inferno13–110.0812%18 Jul
nuke7–130.0732%18 Jul
mirage10–130.0121%16 Jul
dust213–20.078%16 Jul
dust27–130.0020%14 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0214%14 Jul
mirage5–13-0.049%14 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0317%14 Jul
dust213–110.0219%14 Jul
mirage11–130.0228%11 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0412%3 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0126%30 Jun
dust27–13-0.079%30 Jun
inferno9–13-0.086%29 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0411%20 Jun
dust213–70.1013%18 Jun
mirage13–90.0822%12 Jun
dust213–40.0818%11 Jun
cache13–40.0710%10 Jun
dust213–110.0418%10 Jun
dust213–70.0319%4 Jun
mirage3–130.038%2 Jun
mirage16–120.0713%30 May
mirage10–130.0514%24 May
anubis13–10.0510%22 May
ancient13–3-0.047%22 May
anubis6–130.0114%22 May
mirage13–8-0.0011%22 May
nuke5–9-0.0127%22 May
dust213–00.0041%22 May
mirage16–130.039%20 May
dust25–13-0.0328%20 May
mirage13–7-0.0114%19 May
ancient3–13-0.0735%17 May
inferno13–100.0117%17 May
poseidon9–5-0.0215%17 May
dust213–5-0.0217%17 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →