snappers — CS2 Stats

76561199481154688[U:1:1520888960]✓ No bans

2,631Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating12,709Blue band · top ~40.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26825 of 39774 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 949 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnappersFACEITLevel 5 · 949 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,709 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning54
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40573Last 10040%Win rateLLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.1
Aggression8.6
Utility7.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning5.4
Utility7.4
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time581ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — cache 13–3
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 27nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%0.03
dust2C2391439%0.02
ancientD1651131%-0.00
cacheB147750%0.03
infernoD92722%0.01
nukeD71614%-0.04
anubis41325%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

113Matches
49%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
85.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4151%1.1517.6
Dust22552%1.1218.4
Ancient1354%0.8715.6
Inferno1030%1.1415.0
Anubis967%1.4720.1
Cache743%1.0415.0
Nuke425%0.9416.8
Overpass30%0.7114.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
67.5%Counter-strafing
12.8°Preaim
586msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
9.35HE damage / grenade
22.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7908° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–13-0.0123%29 Aug
cache9–130.0517%28 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0526%26 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0219%25 Aug
inferno13–40.0718%23 Aug
ancient12–160.0818%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.1016%21 Aug
dust211–130.0425%21 Aug
ancient8–130.0913%20 Aug
nuke7–13-0.160%19 Aug
dust213–70.0919%18 Aug
mirage13–90.0822%18 Aug
dust215–150.0219%18 Aug
mirage9–130.0315%17 Aug
cache13–10.0514%16 Aug
ancient11–130.0517%16 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0512%1 Aug
dust213–40.1126%1 Aug
inferno13–100.0814%1 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0716%1 Aug
dust214–16-0.0214%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0922%29 Jul
dust29–130.0413%29 Jul
nuke9–130.0214%29 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0813%29 Jul
mirage0–30.000%28 Jul
mirage13–30.0417%27 Jul
dust213–100.1126%27 Jul
mirage13–80.0912%26 Jul
ancient16–120.0219%26 Jul
dust24–130.1133%26 Jul
mirage7–130.0822%26 Jul
cache16–14-0.0311%26 Jul
inferno9–130.0113%24 Jul
cache12–16-0.0417%22 Jul
dust28–130.0115%21 Jul
inferno6–130.0525%21 Jul
mirage13–110.0413%20 Jul
ancient13–16-0.079%20 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0811%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0315%19 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0419%18 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0420%17 Jul
dust20–8-0.010%17 Jul
dust20–13-0.090%17 Jul
nuke13–80.0119%16 Jul
cache6–13-0.0119%16 Jul
nuke10–13-0.037%15 Jul
ancient11–130.0217%14 Jul
mirage13–60.0316%14 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0414%14 Jul
inferno10–130.0120%14 Jul
cache13–5-0.0418%13 Jul
cache8–130.0422%13 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0720%13 Jul
cache13–30.1923%13 Jul
mirage11–130.0523%13 Jul
dust29–13-0.0422%12 Jul
dust213–10-0.0220%12 Jul
cache9–13-0.0031%12 Jul
anubis8–10.0825%12 Jul
ancient13–70.0911%12 Jul
cache4–13-0.0711%12 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0519%11 Jul
dust29–13-0.0412%11 Jul
dust213–16-0.0411%11 Jul
mirage13–50.0729%11 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0414%11 Jul
mirage15–150.0412%10 Jul
cache13–60.1429%10 Jul
dust213–60.0820%10 Jul
ancient9–130.0217%10 Jul
dust214–160.0317%10 Jul
mirage5–130.0019%9 Jul
mirage13–50.1025%9 Jul
mirage13–60.0833%9 Jul
dust213–50.0910%8 Jul
mirage13–30.0412%8 Jul
cache12–120.0216%7 Jul
cache13–80.1020%6 Jul
cache13–50.0523%6 Jul
mirage13–60.0526%6 Jul
ancient5–130.0218%6 Jul
mirage13–50.0323%29 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0511%22 Jun
dust29–13-0.0619%22 Jun
dust213–60.0513%21 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0216%21 Jun
mirage13–100.0716%21 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0610%21 Jun
mirage11–130.0115%21 Jun
mirage13–60.0618%21 Jun
dust213–90.0411%20 Jun
ancient13–110.0316%20 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0116%20 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0914%18 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0815%18 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0119%18 Jun
anubis11–130.0919%18 Jun
dust213–7-0.0131%17 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →