truLyyy — CS2 Stats

76561199480393007[U:1:1520127279]

272Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,131Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9120 of 25648 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtruLyyyPREMIER21,131 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning54
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55405Last 10055%Win rateWLWLLTWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8
Aggression8.0
Utility4.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.9

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time586ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–6
132Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 26infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C29121741%0.02
mirageS2617965%0.04
anubisA159660%0.02
ancientA106460%0.03
cacheA74357%0.02
infernoC52340%0.01
overpass42250%0.01
nuke43175%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches
56%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage475%1.6619.3
Vertigo30%0.9316.3
Nuke1100%1.8322.0
Anubis1100%1.4021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
587msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
58.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
4.54HE damage / grenade
7.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7108% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.1115%24 Aug
mirage11–130.0816%24 Aug
dust213–110.0516%23 Aug
mirage11–130.0835%23 Aug
mirage11–130.0233%21 Aug
dust215–150.0619%20 Aug
inferno13–110.0217%19 Aug
dust214–160.0617%7 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0323%2 Aug
cache2–130.0323%2 Aug
dust213–40.0925%1 Aug
cache10–13-0.0333%1 Aug
dust213–50.0826%1 Aug
ancient16–130.0421%31 Jul
mirage13–80.0423%30 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0324%16 Jul
cache6–3-0.0210%16 Jul
ancient13–50.0231%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0611%15 Jul
dust210–13-0.0411%15 Jul
mirage9–130.0319%13 Jul
cache13–100.029%13 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0421%12 Jul
dust29–130.0822%12 Jul
cache5–13-0.0911%12 Jul
dust215–15-0.0024%11 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0625%11 Jul
anubis13–40.0217%11 Jul
cache13–60.1431%11 Jul
mirage13–50.0729%9 Jul
dust214–160.0120%9 Jul
dust210–13-0.069%6 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0319%5 Jul
inferno13–60.0522%5 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0119%5 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0412%4 Jul
mirage13–60.1218%4 Jul
dust25–0-0.0520%4 Jul
anubis13–60.0520%4 Jul
anubis16–140.0420%3 Jul
mirage16–140.0529%3 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0114%2 Jul
dust213–20.0021%2 Jul
ancient5–130.0123%2 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0125%2 Jul
dust213–80.0618%1 Jul
dust213–80.1222%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0831%30 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0527%30 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0213%29 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0517%29 Jun
anubis9–130.028%27 Jun
mirage13–80.0925%27 Jun
inferno13–160.0217%25 Jun
dust213–90.0922%24 Jun
mirage10–130.0417%24 Jun
overpass13–40.0119%22 Jun
dust24–13-0.0525%22 Jun
dust213–10-0.0113%20 Jun
ancient15–150.0317%20 Jun
anubis13–50.0217%20 Jun
dust210–130.1021%18 Jun
anubis13–20.0624%18 Jun
ancient13–70.0031%16 Jun
mirage13–40.1323%16 Jun
ancient13–60.0320%14 Jun
dust213–60.0418%14 Jun
anubis13–40.1015%13 Jun
dust215–15-0.0423%12 Jun
anubis14–160.0318%12 Jun
mirage13–110.0124%11 Jun
dust213–30.0221%11 Jun
overpass13–60.0226%11 Jun
ancient15–150.0418%10 Jun
mirage13–40.0127%10 Jun
dust26–13-0.0410%10 Jun
mirage13–110.0121%9 Jun
mirage13–20.0934%7 Jun
ancient13–60.1015%7 Jun
dust29–13-0.0517%6 Jun
anubis13–70.0718%5 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0411%3 Jun
dust28–130.0820%3 Jun
nuke13–60.0410%1 Jun
mirage12–160.0414%1 Jun
dust26–130.0519%31 May
mirage13–40.0512%31 May
anubis9–130.0120%30 May
dust213–11-0.0316%21 May
mirage10–130.0316%17 May
dust26–130.0323%16 May
nuke13–110.0218%15 May
anubis13–50.0218%14 May
anubis5–13-0.0813%14 May
ancient13–70.0534%13 May
mirage14–160.0111%10 May
nuke11–130.0220%10 May
overpass10–130.0621%9 May
anubis11–130.0313%8 May
dust211–130.0123%8 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →