Gaydolf — CS2 Stats

76561199476134170[U:1:1515868442]

1,048Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,567Blue band · top ~51.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32430 of 45681 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGaydolfPREMIER10,567 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning42
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateWLLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression4.2
Utility5.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time595ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–4
133Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 32nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S32221069%0.01
mirageA25151060%0.00
ancientB126650%-0.02
nukeD113827%0.01
infernoA106460%0.01
cache41325%0.00
anubis42250%-0.02
overpass2020%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
71.8ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2862%1.2415.3
Mirage450%0.8612.8
Inferno250%1.5018.5
Ancient20%0.6610.5
Nuke1100%0.9120.0
Anubis10%0.8016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
583msReaction time
21.7%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
9.26HE damage / grenade
7.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.7078% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0115%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0318%29 Aug
cache8–13-0.0512%29 Aug
dust213–110.0731%20 Aug
nuke8–130.0612%19 Aug
mirage13–8-0.027%18 Aug
dust213–70.0819%18 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0210%16 Aug
cache11–130.015%16 Aug
dust213–11-0.0411%16 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0811%16 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0012%15 Aug
inferno13–40.1230%14 Aug
mirage10–130.0324%13 Aug
dust213–60.0610%12 Aug
dust213–70.0216%12 Aug
ancient13–40.049%10 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0612%10 Aug
dust213–50.0325%10 Aug
mirage0–4-0.120%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0220%9 Aug
dust213–9-0.0822%9 Aug
inferno13–90.0013%8 Aug
mirage13–70.0017%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.036%8 Aug
dust22–130.0218%8 Aug
cache6–13-0.0332%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0310%7 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0526%6 Aug
dust213–70.0013%6 Aug
mirage13–90.0413%31 Jul
cache13–30.0625%29 Jul
mirage13–40.0731%28 Jul
nuke13–110.0012%26 Jul
mirage16–140.0632%26 Jul
inferno16–140.0613%25 Jul
nuke10–130.0519%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.015%24 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0410%22 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0011%21 Jul
dust213–7-0.0024%20 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0014%19 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0039%19 Jul
dust213–6-0.0117%19 Jul
dust213–110.0439%18 Jul
dust211–130.0228%18 Jul
mirage13–110.038%12 Jul
mirage8–130.1020%8 Jul
dust213–8-0.0119%7 Jul
mirage16–140.0219%20 Jun
dust213–6-0.075%20 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0527%19 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0425%16 Jun
dust27–13-0.0410%15 Jun
ancient8–130.009%14 Jun
dust213–40.0715%13 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0318%11 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0024%11 Jun
dust216–140.0724%9 Jun
dust211–13-0.018%8 Jun
mirage13–110.0714%6 Jun
overpass8–110.1036%5 Jun
dust28–130.0015%4 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0214%3 Jun
dust213–70.0120%3 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0022%3 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0124%2 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0321%1 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0124%31 May
dust214–16-0.0210%31 May
nuke10–130.0511%31 May
mirage13–60.0015%30 May
mirage13–7-0.005%29 May
nuke13–7-0.0114%29 May
dust21–7-0.046%29 May
mirage4–13-0.0415%29 May
dust213–80.0421%28 May
dust213–90.0619%27 May
ancient16–14-0.0321%22 May
nuke4–130.048%22 May
dust25–13-0.0713%22 May
dust25–13-0.0716%22 May
nuke13–6-0.0326%21 May
dust213–60.0811%21 May
dust213–80.0218%21 May
ancient13–6-0.054%21 May
inferno7–13-0.0219%20 May
mirage13–100.0213%19 May
inferno6–13-0.0319%19 May
anubis13–8-0.054%19 May
inferno13–90.0212%19 May
dust213–5-0.034%19 May
nuke12–7-0.0117%18 May
dust213–90.0115%17 May
nuke9–13-0.0314%17 May
ancient13–30.0613%17 May
ancient13–10-0.0119%16 May
dust29–13-0.029%16 May
anubis13–40.0612%16 May
ancient11–13-0.0521%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →