1050Ti Laptop Gaming — CS2 Stats

76561199446639397[U:1:1486373669]

201Tracked matches60%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating6,342Light Blue band · top ~72.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19926 of 26166 tracked
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG1050Ti Laptop GamingPREMIER6,342 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim40
Positioning57
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateLLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.0
Aggression9.4
Utility4.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 708ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.0
Positioning5.7
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time703ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 732ms → last ⅓ avg 703ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 9–4
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32161650%0.01
dust2B26141254%0.01
nukeB126650%-0.02
ancientA106460%0.02
anubisB84450%-0.00
infernoD62433%-0.02
overpassS64267%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
69.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
708msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
58.0%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
6.60HE damage / grenade
8.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 707.9502ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.463% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.006%29 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0913%29 Mar
ancient13–60.0714%24 Mar
mirage13–80.027%21 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0412%21 Mar
dust213–0-0.0031%21 Mar
inferno16–140.0722%9 Mar
mirage6–130.0212%9 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0320%6 Mar
dust29–130.0322%6 Mar
ancient13–90.0817%27 Feb
inferno14–160.018%26 Feb
dust26–13-0.0513%26 Feb
anubis13–90.0430%25 Feb
dust26–13-0.0836%25 Feb
mirage16–120.0314%25 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0215%24 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0611%22 Feb
mirage13–40.1018%19 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0618%19 Feb
mirage8–10.0422%19 Feb
mirage8–130.0113%19 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0721%19 Feb
dust29–40.1726%19 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0022%19 Feb
mirage13–100.0422%17 Feb
nuke13–80.0321%17 Feb
dust27–130.0923%13 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0520%13 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0312%13 Feb
anubis13–80.0419%13 Feb
mirage6–130.0417%13 Feb
dust213–110.0222%13 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0114%13 Feb
dust213–110.0523%13 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0417%13 Feb
ancient10–130.0424%12 Feb
nuke1–13-0.0613%12 Feb
mirage7–130.0019%12 Feb
mirage16–120.0115%12 Feb
dust213–10-0.008%10 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0220%10 Feb
dust22–13-0.0218%10 Feb
ancient6–130.0316%10 Feb
overpass16–13-0.0413%10 Feb
mirage13–50.0615%10 Feb
dust213–30.0619%10 Feb
dust213–5-0.017%9 Feb
nuke4–13-0.063%9 Feb
mirage13–10-0.057%9 Feb
inferno15–15-0.038%9 Feb
nuke7–120.0910%9 Feb
dust24–13-0.049%9 Feb
dust27–13-0.013%9 Feb
nuke3–13-0.049%9 Feb
anubis15–15-0.0111%8 Feb
ancient13–110.0422%8 Feb
nuke13–9-0.013%7 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0312%7 Feb
mirage13–90.0223%7 Feb
dust213–10-0.0217%7 Feb
dust29–130.057%7 Feb
dust25–40.0213%7 Feb
dust213–5-0.0510%7 Feb
nuke9–5-0.0112%7 Feb
mirage13–16-0.007%7 Feb
mirage13–10-0.017%7 Feb
overpass13–100.027%6 Feb
overpass13–40.0020%6 Feb
dust29–13-0.0613%6 Feb
mirage13–10-0.025%6 Feb
anubis15–150.0121%6 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0212%6 Feb
anubis9–13-0.006%6 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0215%6 Feb
anubis13–110.0010%6 Feb
anubis10–13-0.062%6 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0111%6 Feb
mirage7–130.0124%6 Feb
mirage11–130.0514%6 Feb
ancient13–40.0232%6 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0315%5 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0311%5 Feb
overpass5–130.0713%4 Feb
overpass13–2-0.0412%4 Feb
mirage13–70.0631%4 Feb
ancient13–80.0111%4 Feb
mirage13–20.1218%4 Feb
mirage13–90.0116%4 Feb
mirage10–130.0724%4 Feb
dust216–140.1017%3 Feb
ancient13–11-0.048%3 Feb
dust213–60.0812%3 Feb
nuke9–130.0021%3 Feb
dust213–50.0418%3 Feb
dust215–150.057%3 Feb
inferno3–13-0.104%3 Feb
dust213–6-0.0514%3 Feb
overpass11–130.0214%3 Feb
dust211–13-0.0810%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →