guccimort — CS2 Stats

76561199438559534[U:1:1478293806]

683Tracked matches41%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,484Blue band · top ~41.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32738 of 48503 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 973 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGguccimortFACEITLevel 4 · 973 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,484 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning58
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45496Last 10045%Win rateWLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression7.6
Utility4.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.8
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time593ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–5
130Biggest win — overpass
4Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 33% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28121643%0.01
dust2D2791833%0.00
overpassB147750%0.02
nukeA127558%0.01
cacheD62433%-0.01
infernoS64267%-0.02
anubis42250%-0.01
train110100%0.04
vertigo1010%0.02
ancient110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
45%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
81.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage757%1.2421.7
Dust2633%0.9815.3
Ancient333%0.9513.7
Nuke250%0.8419.5
Train1100%1.4014.0
Inferno10%1.0027.0
Overpass10%0.7021.0
Anubis1100%1.3615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
579msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
59.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
3.10HE damage / grenade
12.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8083% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–9-0.0813%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.0216%25 Aug
nuke11–13-0.009%25 Aug
mirage4–130.009%25 Aug
overpass8–130.1017%25 Aug
mirage13–50.0512%25 Aug
cache13–100.0414%25 Aug
dust213–50.1524%25 Aug
nuke3–13-0.019%25 Aug
mirage10–130.0719%25 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0115%24 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0120%24 Aug
dust211–130.0117%24 Aug
overpass13–10-0.0123%24 Aug
mirage12–120.0323%24 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0611%23 Aug
dust27–130.0118%23 Aug
dust28–00.0529%23 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0729%23 Aug
mirage10–130.0718%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0617%23 Aug
anubis13–8-0.019%23 Aug
nuke11–130.0418%22 Aug
overpass7–13-0.049%22 Aug
train13–30.0410%22 Aug
inferno13–50.0121%22 Aug
cache6–130.0116%22 Aug
mirage13–60.0926%22 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0224%22 Aug
mirage0–6-0.070%8 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0113%8 Aug
dust213–10.0714%8 Aug
mirage13–9-0.016%8 Aug
dust212–120.0723%8 Aug
mirage10–130.0719%8 Aug
dust210–130.0312%7 Aug
mirage11–130.1327%7 Aug
overpass4–12-0.0840%1 Aug
dust22–13-0.0225%1 Aug
mirage6–130.0130%24 Jul
dust210–130.0531%22 Jul
cache7–13-0.0918%17 Jul
mirage13–40.0517%17 Jul
dust28–13-0.0410%17 Jul
cache13–7-0.0310%18 May
dust26–13-0.0416%18 May
dust213–10-0.0511%6 May
overpass13–00.0232%6 May
dust23–80.1167%3 May
mirage0–7-0.0625%1 May
cache3–130.0111%1 May
cache11–13-0.0210%1 May
inferno2–6-0.1313%27 Apr
overpass13–50.0825%27 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0619%25 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0523%24 Apr
anubis13–30.1033%24 Apr
nuke13–80.0121%24 Apr
inferno13–40.0813%24 Apr
overpass7–130.0323%24 Apr
dust27–13-0.0121%24 Apr
mirage5–110.0220%24 Apr
overpass2–110.0421%23 Apr
mirage13–40.0224%23 Apr
dust213–8-0.0515%22 Apr
overpass13–70.0424%22 Apr
mirage13–70.0215%21 Apr
overpass9–130.0120%21 Apr
dust213–110.0222%21 Apr
overpass0–3-0.030%21 Apr
dust29–13-0.0414%21 Apr
mirage7–130.0010%21 Apr
nuke13–110.0415%21 Apr
nuke13–100.0118%21 Apr
vertigo12–120.029%21 Apr
dust213–9-0.0217%21 Apr
inferno13–80.0013%21 Apr
overpass8–20.0418%20 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0515%20 Apr
nuke13–90.0528%20 Apr
dust213–100.0223%20 Apr
dust25–13-0.0814%20 Apr
nuke12–120.1045%20 Apr
overpass13–50.0727%20 Apr
mirage2–8-0.140%18 Apr
mirage13–40.0311%18 Apr
dust27–13-0.0411%18 Apr
mirage12–120.0313%18 Apr
dust213–60.0624%18 Apr
nuke13–90.0412%18 Apr
overpass13–70.018%18 Apr
dust26–130.0119%17 Apr
mirage12–8-0.0513%17 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0520%17 Apr
dust29–13-0.0626%15 Apr
mirage13–60.0923%15 Apr
dust212–16-0.0228%15 Apr
mirage11–130.0133%15 Apr
ancient13–10.0814%15 Apr
anubis5–13-0.1011%15 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →