SPEAKER FREAKER — CS2 Stats

76561199434777697[U:1:1474511969]

474Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSPEAKER FREAKERFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning36
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT503812Last 10050%Win rateWWTLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.7
Aggression1.8
Utility6.7
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 11% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 689ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning3.6
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time691ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 691ms
Headshot accuracy12.5%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.4% → last ⅓ avg 12.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — cache 13–3
131Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
52In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB60312952%-0.02
mirageA117464%-0.04
dust2C114736%-0.01
ancientC52340%-0.02
anubis42250%-0.02
overpass21150%-0.03
inferno2020%-0.05
jura21150%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.05
office110100%-0.01
train110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches
50%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
51.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage250%0.979.5
Dust21100%0.578.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.4%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
689msReaction time
10.7%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
13.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.4489% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 10.6845% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–10-0.089%22 May
cache13–11-0.0313%22 May
cache12–12-0.039%22 May
cache4–13-0.078%20 May
cache13–60.067%20 May
cache7–13-0.017%20 May
cache13–80.026%20 May
cache10–5-0.005%20 May
cache13–10-0.097%20 May
cache13–30.1114%19 May
cache11–13-0.038%19 May
cache13–11-0.0412%19 May
cache13–7-0.048%19 May
cache11–13-0.067%19 May
cache5–13-0.0528%19 May
cache13–10-0.065%19 May
cache13–8-0.0319%18 May
cache13–3-0.035%18 May
cache13–80.0511%18 May
cache8–130.0215%18 May
mirage13–90.0323%18 May
cache7–13-0.0910%18 May
cache13–40.0314%18 May
mirage13–10-0.0913%17 May
cache7–13-0.1018%15 May
cache13–60.0019%15 May
overpass1–7-0.0513%15 May
cache6–130.026%13 May
cache13–20.0441%13 May
dust29–13-0.0621%7 May
cache7–13-0.038%7 May
cache13–3-0.0410%7 May
cache10–13-0.0414%7 May
cache13–90.0312%7 May
cache13–70.0218%7 May
cache3–130.049%7 May
cache13–60.0016%6 May
cache7–13-0.077%6 May
cache13–70.0712%6 May
cache0–6-0.0625%6 May
cache3–13-0.107%6 May
mirage7–13-0.089%6 May
cache13–3-0.0015%6 May
cache13–7-0.1118%6 May
cache12–12-0.039%6 May
cache7–13-0.0112%6 May
cache13–10-0.0520%6 May
cache2–13-0.0721%6 May
cache12–12-0.0113%5 May
cache10–13-0.0111%5 May
cache13–40.0811%5 May
cache10–13-0.0713%5 May
cache13–8-0.0512%5 May
cache1–1-0.0550%5 May
cache13–3-0.0117%5 May
cache1–13-0.0614%5 May
mirage16–120.0212%5 May
dust29–130.0312%5 May
mirage13–5-0.0220%5 May
cache9–13-0.0817%4 May
ancient10–13-0.056%4 May
mirage3–13-0.0711%4 May
dust213–5-0.008%4 May
dust212–12-0.034%4 May
cache12–12-0.0115%4 May
cache12–120.018%3 May
dust213–11-0.0412%3 May
cache13–10-0.0613%2 May
dust213–5-0.0123%1 May
cache10–13-0.0112%1 May
anubis2–80.0723%1 May
ancient7–13-0.048%30 Apr
dust26–13-0.0715%30 Apr
mirage8–13-0.044%30 Apr
cache13–100.075%30 Apr
cache5–13-0.068%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0211%30 Apr
cache13–50.039%30 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0210%27 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0914%27 Apr
ancient13–10.0012%24 Apr
mirage13–100.0111%24 Apr
ancient15–15-0.049%23 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0211%11 Jun
anubis13–10-0.065%11 Jun
dust26–00.115%11 Jun
mirage13–5-0.047%10 Jun
mirage9–4-0.100%10 Jun
dust28–130.0318%10 Jun
anubis16–13-0.018%9 Jun
dust212–12-0.019%9 Jun
vertigo7–13-0.0524%9 Jun
office12–6-0.014%9 Jun
jura13–30.0416%9 Jun
jura12–12-0.0216%9 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0112%9 Jun
ancient13–40.0413%9 Jun
dust25–13-0.0613%9 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0715%9 Jun
train13–70.0212%9 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →