MrDylluxe — CS2 Stats

76561199412105556[U:1:1451839828]Steam profile ↗

1,655Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,314Purple band · top ~19.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11032 of 19583 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning47

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLLWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9

Aggression4.4

Utility4.2

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning4.7

Utility4.2

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time516ms−40ms

first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms

Headshot accuracy15.4%+1.5%

first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 11–13

13–1Biggest win — anubis

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 66% over 29cacheWeakest map · 15% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	S	29	19–10	66%	0.01
ancient	S	20	13–7	65%	-0.01
mirage	D	15	4–11	27%	0.00
cache	D	13	2–11	15%	-0.02
dust2	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.01
nuke	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.02
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

346Matches

51%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

77.5ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	69	55%	1.23	16.8
Mirage	59	54%	1.03	15.7
Ancient	44	48%	0.90	13.7
Nuke	32	50%	1.03	15.3
Dust2	30	50%	0.99	14.8
Inferno	20	50%	0.98	16.7
Cache	16	25%	1.04	14.0
Vertigo	4	75%	1.21	16.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.7%Spray accuracy

79.4%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

517msReaction time

21.9%T opening success

46.8%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

7.24HE damage / grenade

4.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4195 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.8506% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	8–13	-0.08	9%	28 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.04	19%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	17%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.07	14%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.06	7%	27 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	23%	26 Aug →
anubis	15–19	-0.02	14%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	15%	26 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	6%	25 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.00	16%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	18%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.02	14%	23 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.00	34%	23 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	12%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.04	13%	23 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.02	26%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.00	10%	23 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.06	26%	23 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	21%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.01	19%	22 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	14%	22 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.00	14%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.00	11%	22 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.05	22%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.11	15%	22 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	11%	21 Aug →
dust2	0–2	-0.12	0%	21 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	7%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.01	15%	20 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.07	17%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.01	16%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.03	14%	19 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	6%	19 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	14%	19 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	5%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.00	12%	18 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.03	8%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	13%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	18%	17 Aug →
nuke	4–0	-0.01	0%	17 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.06	32%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	20%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–2	-0.01	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	21%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.04	10%	14 Aug →
vertigo	13–4	-0.01	6%	14 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	10%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.04	16%	14 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	12%	13 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.00	22%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	13%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	11%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.00	11%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	24%	12 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	12%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	9%	11 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	11%	11 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.01	10%	10 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	11%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.02	10%	10 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.07	10%	10 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.12	12%	9 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.04	8%	9 Aug →
mirage	0–2	0.00	0%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	6%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	20%	8 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	15%	8 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	13%	8 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	5%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	15%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	13%	7 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	12%	7 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.02	11%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.08	13%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	15%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	8%	7 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.11	19%	7 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	19%	6 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	38%	6 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.07	18%	6 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	13%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.05	25%	5 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.01	11%	5 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	7%	5 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	9%	5 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.07	12%	4 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.00	7%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	11%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	10%	1 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	13%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.04	14%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	8%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	21%	31 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.00	23%	30 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.03	12%	30 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	10%	30 Jul →