Blizz4rd

Blizz4rd — CS2 Stats

PL76561199404429021[U:1:1444163293]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,550Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,601Purple band · top ~18% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20003 of 38799 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,698 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBlizz4rdFACEITLevel 9 · 1,698 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER17,601 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning56
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48511Last 10048%Win rateLWLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1
Aggression8.5
Utility6.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.6
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time609ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–9
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2314961%-0.01
infernoB1991047%0.01
dust2C167944%-0.01
cacheB147750%0.01
nukeD93633%-0.01
anubisD91811%0.00
ancientS64267%0.02
overpass43175%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

403Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
86.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15257%1.2317.7
Inferno5848%1.2718.8
Ancient4349%1.1116.0
Anubis3450%1.0115.6
Dust23247%0.9516.1
Nuke2864%1.1215.0
Overpass1547%1.4821.3
Vertigo1369%1.5320.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
615msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
61.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
10.09HE damage / grenade
15.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7359% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–90.1427%29 Aug
cache13–100.0528%29 Aug
inferno2–9-0.0770%29 Aug
inferno5–90.0124%29 Aug
nuke6–130.0129%26 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1815%20 Aug
nuke11–130.0224%15 Aug
dust213–110.0119%15 Aug
cache13–60.0326%12 Aug
cache14–16-0.0230%10 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0121%10 Aug
inferno13–110.0927%10 Aug
ancient13–50.1023%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0319%10 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0130%9 Aug
mirage7–130.0126%8 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0621%7 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0413%7 Aug
cache13–90.0126%7 Aug
cache13–50.0226%7 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0416%6 Aug
dust213–60.0926%6 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0619%3 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0224%3 Aug
mirage13–00.0823%3 Aug
cache5–130.0418%3 Aug
inferno13–100.0620%2 Aug
dust22–13-0.0616%2 Aug
inferno13–60.0826%2 Aug
inferno11–130.0124%2 Aug
cache10–13-0.0419%2 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0120%2 Aug
anubis4–130.0417%2 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0114%2 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0632%1 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0439%1 Aug
cache10–13-0.0143%31 Jul
nuke10–130.0528%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0817%31 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0126%31 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0723%30 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0224%30 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0214%27 Jul
cache4–13-0.0917%27 Jul
mirage6–00.0316%27 Jul
dust28–13-0.0411%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0819%25 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0321%25 Jul
dust213–10-0.0323%25 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0025%24 Jul
dust26–130.0212%24 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0123%24 Jul
inferno13–60.0113%24 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0335%24 Jul
cache16–120.1234%23 Jul
anubis13–60.0724%23 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0130%23 Jul
ancient13–100.0522%12 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0026%12 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0326%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0429%12 Jul
cache13–110.0124%11 Jul
cache15–150.0722%10 Jul
mirage8–10.1217%10 Jul
dust213–80.029%10 Jul
dust24–130.0220%10 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0224%9 Jul
anubis11–130.0113%5 Jul
overpass13–40.029%3 Jul
dust22–13-0.1214%3 Jul
inferno6–40.0238%3 Jul
ancient13–40.0430%3 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0416%2 Jul
dust216–14-0.0418%1 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0719%1 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0222%1 Jul
dust23–13-0.0426%24 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0226%17 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0224%12 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0225%7 Jun
mirage9–130.0218%6 Jun
mirage13–60.0222%4 Jun
anubis7–130.0324%4 Jun
dust210–13-0.0422%19 May
inferno13–100.0315%18 May
anubis10–130.0118%16 May
mirage16–14-0.0327%15 May
cache6–13-0.0534%12 May
cache13–3-0.0523%12 May
dust213–60.0634%12 May
overpass13–7-0.0124%12 May
ancient8–13-0.0221%11 May
mirage5–13-0.0218%11 May
dust210–13-0.0415%10 May
mirage13–5-0.0110%10 May
ancient5–13-0.0419%3 May
dust213–80.0726%2 May
mirage13–40.0517%2 May
inferno13–90.1625%2 May
overpass13–110.0321%30 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →