Shai Mid Range

Shai Mid Range — CS2 Stats

76561199396335746[U:1:1436070018]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,486Tracked matches40%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating11,894Blue band · top ~44.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36677 of 53456 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,894 +0 29 Aug30 Aug · 2 observations
11,89411,894peak 11,89429 Aug30 Aug
11,894Peak Premier on CSDB
2Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 11,894
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,106 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShai Mid RangeFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,894 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning42
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateLWWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression4.1
Utility6.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.2
Utility6.5
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time515ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — inferno 9–1
130Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 20dust2Weakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA23131057%0.04
infernoS2013765%0.03
mirageB1910953%0.03
anubisA148657%0.01
dust2C135838%0.02
ancientB84450%0.03
cache31233%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

167Matches
48%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4040%1.1615.5
Dust22752%0.9813.8
Inferno2450%1.3518.5
Nuke2361%1.3219.6
Anubis1747%1.1215.7
Ancient1650%1.0816.9
Cache1631%0.9514.5
Overpass475%1.2617.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
72.9%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
514msReaction time
15.5%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
9.47HE damage / grenade
11.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.5316% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–90.0341%30 Aug
inferno9–10.2533%30 Aug
inferno9–50.0836%30 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0511%30 Aug
dust22–130.0113%30 Aug
cache10–13-0.0216%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0025%29 Aug
anubis13–90.038%29 Aug
nuke2–130.0216%29 Aug
dust213–70.0114%29 Aug
anubis13–80.0024%28 Aug
nuke4–13-0.046%28 Aug
inferno13–70.0019%28 Aug
anubis5–13-0.045%27 Aug
mirage10–130.0624%27 Aug
mirage13–80.1318%27 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0620%27 Aug
dust28–130.0016%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0413%27 Aug
inferno3–13-0.046%27 Aug
dust28–13-0.0212%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0313%26 Aug
mirage13–90.0414%26 Aug
inferno13–90.0115%26 Aug
dust213–90.1022%26 Aug
nuke8–130.0121%25 Aug
ancient11–130.0924%25 Aug
inferno13–60.0513%25 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0610%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0414%24 Aug
mirage11–130.0516%24 Aug
inferno13–40.1021%24 Aug
mirage13–60.0820%24 Aug
anubis3–13-0.027%23 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0312%23 Aug
ancient13–110.1513%23 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0417%23 Aug
dust210–130.0317%23 Aug
inferno9–70.0620%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0913%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.069%22 Aug
nuke15–150.1421%22 Aug
dust213–70.0416%22 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0213%22 Aug
inferno11–130.0425%22 Aug
dust213–60.0816%22 Aug
nuke13–110.0128%22 Aug
mirage14–160.0624%22 Aug
inferno13–110.0317%22 Aug
nuke13–40.0216%22 Aug
nuke13–80.1017%21 Aug
anubis13–90.026%21 Aug
cache13–80.0517%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0110%21 Aug
nuke13–90.0421%21 Aug
ancient13–60.0527%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0617%21 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0920%21 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0124%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0433%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0119%21 Aug
ancient13–40.0414%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0012%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.1025%21 Aug
anubis13–20.0719%21 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0017%21 Aug
dust29–130.0412%20 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0224%20 Aug
nuke16–140.0414%20 Aug
nuke13–50.0918%20 Aug
inferno13–70.0122%20 Aug
inferno13–160.0223%19 Aug
anubis13–90.0712%19 Aug
nuke13–70.1429%19 Aug
nuke13–80.0726%19 Aug
inferno13–100.0217%19 Aug
mirage13–60.0412%19 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0419%18 Aug
inferno5–0-0.008%18 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0119%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0324%18 Aug
anubis16–120.0710%18 Aug
mirage7–130.0423%17 Aug
mirage13–50.1218%17 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0316%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0010%17 Aug
nuke10–130.0532%16 Aug
nuke13–50.1929%16 Aug
inferno13–50.1319%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0531%16 Aug
inferno9–130.0129%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0516%16 Aug
nuke15–150.0721%16 Aug
nuke13–00.0818%16 Aug
anubis7–130.0517%16 Aug
nuke6–130.0119%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.000%14 Aug
nuke13–110.018%14 Aug
dust213–60.0027%14 Aug
nuke13–20.0330%14 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →