ConsistentlyInconsistent

ConsistentlyInconsistent — CS2 Stats

76561199387831281[U:1:1427565553]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

280Tracked matches54%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,080 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGConsistentlyInconsistentFACEITLevel 5 · 1,080 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning64
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT504010Last 10050%Win rateWLWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression9.5
Utility3.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch1.4

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.4
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time616ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — inferno 9–5
130Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
33In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 15cacheWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB24131154%0.09
mirageS1510567%0.03
nukeC145936%0.04
dust2B147750%0.04
vertigoA95456%0.06
anubisB63350%0.04
cacheD51420%0.04
ancient41325%0.00
office330100%0.12
train32167%0.08
poseidon1010%0.02
warden1010%0.01
overpass1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

112Matches
46%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
84.4ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3546%1.1116.6
Dust22060%1.2620.1
Inferno1963%1.3016.7
Ancient1828%1.1317.6
Nuke922%1.0214.6
Overpass743%1.1317.7
Anubis333%1.1212.7
Train10%1.0018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
636msReaction time
58.5%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
5.57HE damage / grenade
7.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4539 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–00.1327%27 Jul
cache4–130.0830%26 Jul
nuke13–50.1522%25 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0625%23 Jul
inferno9–50.2438%22 Jul
anubis13–40.0727%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.0533%15 Jul
inferno19–170.0219%12 Jul
dust213–30.2033%12 Jul
cache1–4-0.0330%12 Jul
inferno8–80.0615%11 Jul
inferno9–50.2241%10 Jul
office13–70.1639%9 Jul
office13–40.1729%8 Jul
inferno9–10.2929%6 Jul
cache5–130.0927%1 Jul
mirage13–50.0413%26 Jun
inferno8–80.0818%20 Jun
nuke1–5-0.0118%20 Jun
ancient12–120.0216%6 Jun
vertigo5–90.0228%25 May
train13–40.1520%23 May
poseidon6–90.0224%23 May
dust28–13-0.0726%22 May
inferno5–9-0.0433%16 May
office13–110.0417%16 May
inferno9–60.1018%2 May
nuke13–60.0324%2 May
inferno9–50.2955%1 May
dust24–13-0.085%1 May
dust213–50.1827%1 May
mirage1–130.0022%1 May
anubis6–13-0.0521%29 Apr
cache13–40.0329%29 Apr
cache8–100.0426%29 Apr
inferno13–80.1013%20 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0824%18 Apr
nuke8–130.0516%9 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0320%9 Apr
inferno3–9-0.0733%9 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.0433%9 Apr
vertigo3–130.0432%9 Apr
vertigo13–100.0729%9 Apr
nuke8–80.1135%30 Mar
mirage13–100.0118%30 Mar
inferno5–90.0525%30 Mar
dust211–130.0028%20 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0140%20 Mar
inferno4–90.0938%20 Mar
mirage15–150.0024%18 Mar
nuke10–130.0021%17 Mar
vertigo9–30.1816%15 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0627%10 Mar
inferno9–50.0711%10 Mar
dust213–20.0324%10 Mar
inferno0–90.000%6 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0527%6 Mar
dust29–130.0726%5 Mar
dust213–110.0718%2 Mar
dust213–30.1018%2 Mar
train2–130.0121%2 Mar
mirage13–50.0619%24 Feb
inferno13–70.1020%24 Feb
dust25–130.0124%23 Feb
nuke3–13-0.0424%16 Feb
nuke13–30.0414%13 Feb
vertigo13–5-0.0715%12 Feb
mirage3–130.0122%12 Feb
warden3–130.0118%12 Feb
inferno13–40.0516%12 Feb
mirage13–60.0512%10 Feb
mirage8–20.0022%10 Feb
nuke8–130.1431%9 Feb
anubis13–30.1317%9 Feb
nuke13–90.0639%7 Feb
inferno13–40.0020%5 Feb
anubis6–130.000%2 Feb
mirage13–20.1036%2 Feb
nuke8–130.0125%1 Feb
vertigo11–130.0931%1 Feb
vertigo13–90.0914%23 Jan
dust27–130.0716%23 Jan
nuke8–80.1530%23 Jan
mirage13–60.1526%23 Jan
dust213–30.0417%23 Jan
ancient4–00.1038%23 Jan
vertigo13–50.1137%23 Jan
inferno4–9-0.0419%22 Jan
inferno8–80.1428%20 Jan
overpass12–120.0522%20 Jan
mirage11–10.0125%20 Jan
dust28–13-0.0523%20 Jan
train13–30.0830%13 Jan
inferno8–80.1221%8 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0541%4 Jan
mirage13–4-0.0330%4 Jan
inferno9–30.2421%1 Jan
inferno9–50.0721%30 Dec
inferno9–130.0026%30 Dec
mirage13–70.0933%29 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →