PennyS — CS2 Stats

76561199379047044[U:1:1418781316]✓ No bans

346Tracked matches55%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning63
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51436Last 10051%Win rateLWWLLLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4
Aggression10.0
Utility2.7
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch1.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.3
Utility2.7
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.09
first ⅓ avg 0.12 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time521ms+50ms
first ⅓ avg 471ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy33.8%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 35.3% → last ⅓ avg 33.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.35Best rating — inferno 13–3
130Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
24In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA29171259%0.06
mirageB24131154%0.08
ancientC83538%0.08
dust2S86275%0.07
vertigoC83538%0.07
overpassS64267%0.15
nukeD61517%0.03
anubisC52340%0.17
train41325%0.07
italy1010%-0.06
memento110100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches
61%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
81.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
35%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage450%1.2618.8
Vertigo4100%1.4523.3
Inferno475%0.9113.3
Ancient30%0.498.3
Dust23100%2.7316.0
Overpass250%1.0415.5
Nuke10%1.0729.0
Train10%0.5910.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.8%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
6.3°Preaim
522msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
65.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
6.56HE damage / grenade
6.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.5272% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.0719%19 Mar
inferno13–90.0432%27 Feb
train13–30.1347%27 Feb
train5–13-0.0412%26 Aug
overpass10–130.0115%26 Aug
anubis1–5-0.05100%25 May
mirage12–120.1418%23 May
ancient13–40.1135%23 May
mirage2–13-0.050%12 Feb
inferno13–8-0.06100%12 Feb
dust213–0-0.0456%12 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0125%12 Feb
mirage13–110.0432%11 Feb
inferno13–40.1126%11 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0630%11 Feb
overpass9–40.1623%11 Feb
inferno3–9-0.0911%11 Feb
inferno0–130.0111%11 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0528%11 Feb
mirage1–70.0780%11 Feb
mirage4–130.0331%9 Feb
inferno13–70.0940%7 Feb
inferno9–70.1430%7 Feb
inferno13–70.0320%5 Feb
nuke0–9-0.1333%5 Feb
dust213–1-0.0127%4 Feb
mirage13–50.1332%3 Feb
dust210–130.0043%3 Feb
inferno13–50.0629%3 Feb
vertigo13–40.1436%30 Jan
mirage13–10.1148%30 Jan
mirage16–120.0518%30 Jan
ancient11–130.0829%30 Jan
ancient13–70.0229%30 Jan
nuke13–20.0840%30 Jan
mirage15–15-0.0217%30 Jan
mirage8–130.0563%30 Nov
inferno13–40.1233%30 Nov
inferno0–9-0.2150%30 Nov
nuke2–9-0.0583%28 Nov
nuke3–9-0.0348%28 Nov
inferno2–9-0.1247%28 Nov
inferno9–30.1219%28 Nov
dust213–80.1532%27 Nov
train5–130.1330%26 Nov
anubis9–130.1229%22 Nov
anubis13–70.2928%22 Nov
train5–130.0636%22 Nov
vertigo3–130.1424%22 Nov
mirage0–13-0.040%21 Nov
dust20–8-0.0230%21 Nov
mirage13–90.1021%13 Nov
inferno9–50.1631%13 Nov
vertigo13–20.0824%13 Nov
italy2–13-0.0623%3 Oct
inferno13–7-0.0224%24 Sept
mirage8–2-0.070%24 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0213%24 Sept
dust213–8-0.0114%24 Sept
inferno9–130.3356%13 Sept
nuke10–130.2344%29 Aug
mirage6–130.1043%24 Aug
nuke15–150.0929%24 Aug
inferno13–30.1317%24 Aug
overpass9–40.2730%16 Aug
dust213–20.2246%16 Aug
mirage13–40.2737%24 Jul
ancient6–130.1838%17 Jul
inferno12–120.2229%17 Jul
mirage13–100.1933%11 Jul
inferno13–30.3536%11 Jul
inferno13–40.2236%11 Jul
mirage13–10.1831%11 Jul
ancient0–2-0.070%11 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0614%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.1316%11 Jul
inferno13–00.1736%9 Jul
vertigo8–8-0.05100%9 Jul
vertigo13–50.2729%9 Jul
inferno5–130.0751%9 Jul
mirage13–70.2244%9 Jul
ancient5–40.2322%9 Jul
inferno0–13-0.1538%9 Jul
mirage13–70.2628%8 Jul
overpass5–130.1027%8 Jul
vertigo2–13-0.0791%6 Jul
overpass13–10.1133%5 Jul
anubis10–130.1825%5 Jul
dust213–80.2252%4 Jul
inferno13–20.0329%4 Jul
overpass13–70.2434%4 Jul
mirage10–10.1560%4 Jul
vertigo5–90.0471%3 Jul
ancient12–120.1436%3 Jul
anubis13–70.3218%3 Jul
mirage13–60.1719%3 Jul
inferno4–130.0212%3 Jul
memento9–30.1331%3 Jul
vertigo4–90.0123%3 Jul
inferno13–90.1324%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →