Ratdad

Ratdad — CS2 Stats

76561199244160813[U:1:1283895085]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,041Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,812Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7815 of 42606 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,321 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRatdadFACEITLevel 9 · 1,321 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,812 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning57
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50428Last 10050%Win rateTTTLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression6.0
Utility5.7
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.7
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time624ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — nuke 9–4
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 8cacheWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113862%-0.02
ancientC1871139%-0.00
nukeB137654%-0.01
cacheD113827%-0.02
anubisB105550%0.01
dust2A85363%-0.02
poseidonC83538%-0.02
mirageC52340%-0.00
vertigo440100%0.01
debris1010%-0.06
office110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

910Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
81.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis16554%1.1416.8
Mirage14847%0.9814.4
Ancient14757%1.1015.8
Vertigo13056%1.0115.2
Nuke10653%1.1216.4
Inferno9245%0.9214.5
Dust28137%0.9815.5
Overpass1958%1.1314.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
582msReaction time
25.6%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
9.89HE damage / grenade
6.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5619% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–8-0.0425%26 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0720%25 Aug
nuke8–80.0426%25 Aug
cache0–13-0.089%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0317%18 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0218%16 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0320%14 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0121%12 Aug
vertigo13–40.0227%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0710%8 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0148%8 Aug
anubis10–130.0117%5 Aug
dust213–10-0.0315%5 Aug
anubis13–8-0.048%4 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0840%4 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0730%1 Aug
inferno9–60.0630%1 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1920%1 Aug
nuke9–50.0764%1 Aug
inferno7–90.0138%1 Aug
poseidon1–9-0.1119%1 Aug
ancient13–30.0919%31 Jul
inferno9–50.0527%30 Jul
inferno9–60.0520%30 Jul
anubis5–130.0215%30 Jul
inferno9–50.1230%29 Jul
inferno4–9-0.1131%28 Jul
anubis11–130.0024%27 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0125%27 Jul
poseidon9–60.0025%27 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0029%27 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0516%26 Jul
ancient11–130.0031%26 Jul
anubis13–70.0426%26 Jul
nuke13–3-0.066%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0313%23 Jul
dust213–7-0.0516%22 Jul
cache6–130.0429%22 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0623%22 Jul
dust27–13-0.0716%22 Jul
cache3–130.0214%22 Jul
inferno13–100.0624%21 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0017%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0325%21 Jul
ancient13–50.0418%21 Jul
anubis10–130.0529%20 Jul
ancient13–40.0729%20 Jul
inferno13–100.0323%20 Jul
cache7–130.0028%20 Jul
nuke13–70.0728%20 Jul
ancient13–20.0221%20 Jul
cache10–13-0.0513%20 Jul
ancient14–160.0223%19 Jul
dust213–10.0528%19 Jul
dust213–7-0.0121%19 Jul
cache13–90.0113%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0222%19 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0219%18 Jul
anubis13–110.0111%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.047%18 Jul
dust25–13-0.0418%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0233%17 Jul
mirage13–10.0319%17 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0622%17 Jul
poseidon9–70.0229%16 Jul
poseidon8–80.0121%16 Jul
poseidon8–8-0.0137%14 Jul
poseidon9–40.1133%14 Jul
poseidon7–90.0430%14 Jul
poseidon1–9-0.2129%14 Jul
inferno1–9-0.2615%14 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0410%13 Jul
inferno7–9-0.1219%12 Jul
debris4–9-0.0618%12 Jul
mirage9–130.0032%11 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0213%11 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0015%11 Jul
cache1–13-0.1211%11 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0413%11 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0230%11 Jul
cache13–110.0124%11 Jul
ancient13–40.0321%11 Jul
ancient8–130.0317%11 Jul
nuke13–110.0118%10 Jul
dust213–110.0124%10 Jul
cache0–13-0.0811%10 Jul
inferno13–110.0326%10 Jul
cache11–130.0027%10 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0312%9 Jul
anubis13–50.0218%9 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0722%9 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0417%9 Jul
vertigo13–60.0533%8 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0416%8 Jul
inferno9–50.1332%8 Jul
nuke9–40.1828%8 Jul
nuke5–9-0.1117%8 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0423%8 Jul
cache13–6-0.0122%8 Jul
office13–7-0.0636%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →