beci1122 — CS2 Stats

76561199207462590[U:1:1247196862]✓ No bans

1,544Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,377 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbeci1122FACEITLevel 10 · 2,377 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning48
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5545Last 10055%Win rateLWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression3.8
Utility6.2
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.8
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time605ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–2
132Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
136In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA27161159%-0.02
mirageB24121250%-0.01
anubisB157847%-0.02
dust2C125742%0.00
infernoS128467%0.00
nukeS64267%0.02
vertigo330100%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,931Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
74.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage31650%0.9814.0
Ancient30059%1.0615.8
Dust218148%1.0015.6
Anubis15348%1.0315.8
Inferno14949%1.0115.5
Vertigo5655%1.0514.9
Nuke4856%1.1416.5
Train3967%1.0515.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
612msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
42.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
9.29HE damage / grenade
15.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.1091% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.0521%21 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0134%19 Aug
dust216–140.0131%19 Aug
mirage11–130.0327%9 Aug
ancient13–70.0233%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0229%8 Aug
nuke13–70.0630%7 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0729%27 Jul
ancient13–80.0133%21 Jul
dust23–13-0.0425%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0228%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0124%10 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0019%8 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0033%29 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0014%14 Jun
dust26–13-0.0326%5 Mar
anubis17–190.0321%17 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0423%14 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0715%9 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0224%1 Feb
ancient13–110.0026%18 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0111%12 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0419%8 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0229%3 Dec
dust216–140.0123%2 Nov
dust29–130.0114%29 Oct
ancient10–130.0123%25 Oct
inferno13–30.0628%25 Oct
dust213–80.0724%17 Oct
dust211–130.0321%17 Oct
dust29–130.0121%16 Oct
ancient19–15-0.0113%12 Oct
dust29–13-0.0713%9 Oct
nuke8–13-0.0325%1 Oct
mirage13–80.0331%8 Sept
dust213–30.0332%28 Aug
ancient13–30.0525%28 Aug
inferno13–90.0924%28 Aug
anubis13–80.0321%13 Jul
dust213–100.0118%13 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0535%13 Jul
nuke13–50.0223%4 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0413%3 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0120%27 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0135%21 Jun
inferno16–130.0122%14 Jun
anubis13–100.0210%14 Jun
mirage14–160.0114%9 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0129%1 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0129%20 May
ancient1–11-0.0510%18 May
ancient6–13-0.0331%14 May
anubis6–13-0.0521%12 May
ancient13–4-0.0436%5 Apr
anubis16–14-0.0420%10 Mar
anubis13–110.0136%10 Mar
ancient13–100.0131%1 Mar
dust27–13-0.0029%1 Mar
ancient16–13-0.0135%27 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0127%27 Feb
inferno13–160.0626%21 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0224%2 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0720%24 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0024%21 Jan
anubis13–16-0.0422%17 Jan
nuke13–80.0724%21 Dec
mirage13–16-0.0319%15 Dec
mirage19–15-0.0323%15 Dec
ancient13–70.0129%14 Dec
anubis8–12-0.0424%10 Dec
mirage13–30.0824%10 Dec
anubis9–13-0.0221%4 Dec
ancient13–40.0516%1 Dec
ancient4–13-0.1017%30 Nov
ancient19–17-0.0123%24 Nov
mirage12–16-0.0119%18 Nov
mirage5–13-0.0617%6 Oct
mirage10–13-0.067%2 Oct
ancient4–13-0.1323%21 Sept
vertigo13–11-0.0229%21 Sept
ancient19–15-0.1019%18 Sept
inferno8–13-0.036%18 Sept
mirage9–130.0727%7 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0518%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0323%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0618%7 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0210%7 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0421%7 Mar
vertigo13–8-0.0340%7 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0831%7 Mar
mirage13–20.1547%7 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0511%5 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0326%5 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0613%5 Mar
mirage13–40.0736%5 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0818%4 Mar
inferno13–110.0013%4 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0413%4 Mar
vertigo13–11-0.0526%4 Mar
inferno13–90.0423%29 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →