CheraSIM — CS2 Stats

76561199202744186[U:1:1242478458]

861Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,310 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCheraSIMFACEITLevel 10 · 2,310 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning55
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD355411Last 10035%Win rateTLLLTLLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression7.1
Utility6.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time616ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — nuke 9–2
131Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 6infernoWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC34142041%0.02
dust2D1951426%0.02
ancientC167944%0.02
anubisC73443%0.06
nukeB63350%-0.01
infernoD6060%-0.04
vertigo42250%0.04
cache41325%0.07
poseidon2020%-0.04
train1010%0.01
office1010%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

596Matches
55%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
78.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15057%1.1317.2
Ancient5549%0.9816.4
Anubis5155%1.0716.1
Dust24943%0.8613.8
Inferno4766%0.9714.5
Vertigo3459%1.2719.8
Nuke1850%0.9512.8
Overpass1346%1.0319.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
618msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
56.5%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
8.82HE damage / grenade
15.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.5785% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–120.0111%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0338%29 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0411%29 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0618%18 Jun
dust215–150.0617%18 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0628%17 Jun
dust21–5-0.0313%15 Jun
dust215–150.0217%15 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0219%15 Jun
dust23–13-0.1113%15 Jun
vertigo13–60.0514%5 Jun
mirage13–60.0818%31 May
mirage13–60.0120%31 May
nuke0–9-0.2450%31 May
inferno9–13-0.0417%31 May
mirage3–13-0.0016%30 May
mirage13–110.0420%30 May
dust213–70.0025%30 May
mirage9–130.0422%30 May
ancient13–40.0614%30 May
mirage2–13-0.0221%30 May
ancient13–110.0215%30 May
anubis13–10-0.0311%30 May
ancient2–130.1220%24 May
dust213–100.0617%24 May
dust27–13-0.0513%24 May
mirage13–7-0.0413%23 May
anubis11–130.0517%23 May
mirage13–10-0.0118%22 May
anubis11–130.0918%22 May
ancient7–130.0318%22 May
mirage13–30.0829%22 May
mirage8–130.0421%22 May
anubis13–90.0415%22 May
mirage4–130.1616%21 May
mirage5–13-0.0220%21 May
inferno3–9-0.1014%21 May
dust22–13-0.0232%19 May
mirage1–130.0118%19 May
dust28–130.0422%18 May
dust213–100.0617%18 May
mirage10–130.0422%18 May
dust21–13-0.0324%17 May
nuke13–2-0.0718%17 May
dust213–30.0417%17 May
mirage13–80.0119%17 May
dust25–130.0818%16 May
mirage6–130.1018%16 May
dust21–130.0024%16 May
mirage13–30.0920%15 May
cache13–40.0716%14 May
dust212–120.0618%14 May
dust211–130.1512%13 May
dust213–30.1925%13 May
mirage1–9-0.1227%13 May
inferno0–8-0.130%12 May
inferno3–9-0.0529%12 May
cache2–130.1222%11 May
vertigo7–90.0928%10 May
nuke9–20.3117%10 May
inferno8–80.1314%10 May
cache12–120.0425%9 May
cache7–130.0315%9 May
ancient9–13-0.008%7 May
mirage13–60.0726%7 May
dust21–8-0.160%26 Apr
train3–130.0111%26 Apr
nuke13–2-0.0024%26 Apr
dust27–13-0.0314%20 Apr
office4–90.1432%18 Apr
ancient13–110.0318%18 Apr
mirage13–50.0319%18 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0111%18 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0817%18 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0323%18 Apr
mirage9–130.0211%16 Apr
mirage13–60.0027%16 Apr
mirage13–10.1719%16 Apr
mirage12–120.0828%13 Apr
mirage13–90.0817%13 Apr
mirage6–130.0623%12 Apr
ancient2–80.0118%12 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0017%11 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0526%11 Apr
ancient7–130.0234%10 Apr
ancient13–100.0412%10 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0123%10 Apr
ancient13–8-0.025%10 Apr
poseidon8–8-0.0721%9 Apr
vertigo8–130.0615%9 Apr
vertigo13–7-0.0211%9 Apr
poseidon7–9-0.0216%6 Apr
ancient2–70.0233%5 Apr
anubis13–20.2217%4 Apr
anubis12–120.0722%4 Apr
ancient12–120.0229%4 Apr
ancient13–30.0818%4 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0219%4 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0213%4 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0313%4 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →