elfenomeno23 — CS2 Stats

76561199161158027[U:1:1200892299]✓ No bans

2,455Tracked matches29%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating7,262Light Blue band · top ~68% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25037 of 33196 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGelfenomeno23PREMIER7,262 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning47
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD34606Last 10034%Win rateLLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression4.3
Utility6.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.7
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time642ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 690ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — ancient 13–7
131Biggest win — cache
3Longest win streak
L10Current streak
011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 14anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2371630%-0.02
nukeB157847%-0.00
mirageD1431121%-0.03
cacheA148657%-0.01
infernoD134931%-0.03
anubisD102820%-0.02
ancientD82625%-0.00
office21150%0.02
overpass1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

210Matches
46%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
79.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4941%1.1816.5
Inferno3352%1.3115.4
Ancient3342%1.2016.4
Anubis3241%1.0314.4
Nuke2854%1.2017.5
Dust22055%0.9414.3
Vertigo838%1.0118.8
Train475%1.3015.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
69.4%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
639msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
28.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
11.22HE damage / grenade
6.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9025% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0713%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0535%26 Aug
cache5–13-0.0116%25 Aug
cache8–13-0.0123%23 Aug
dust21–13-0.0715%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0133%23 Aug
mirage4–130.0322%22 Aug
nuke6–130.0518%22 Aug
inferno9–130.0115%22 Aug
mirage7–130.0016%21 Aug
ancient13–70.1014%21 Aug
cache13–70.0215%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0611%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0625%20 Aug
nuke15–150.0016%17 Aug
dust213–10-0.0231%17 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0319%16 Aug
ancient3–13-0.036%16 Aug
nuke13–30.0421%15 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0024%15 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0320%15 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0218%15 Aug
dust213–40.0122%15 Aug
nuke10–130.0517%14 Aug
anubis13–10-0.039%14 Aug
ancient13–40.0525%14 Aug
inferno6–130.0314%14 Aug
anubis6–2-0.0219%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0426%14 Aug
anubis11–130.0412%13 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0014%13 Aug
dust213–5-0.0313%13 Aug
office12–120.0312%11 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0215%7 Aug
dust215–15-0.0310%7 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0426%6 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0413%5 Aug
ancient8–13-0.025%5 Aug
nuke13–60.0410%5 Aug
dust28–130.0311%4 Aug
cache13–10-0.1013%4 Aug
nuke13–16-0.035%4 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0416%4 Aug
dust27–13-0.0123%4 Aug
inferno6–13-0.088%4 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0016%3 Aug
dust214–16-0.0110%3 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0214%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0416%2 Aug
cache13–70.0433%31 Jul
dust213–16-0.0613%30 Jul
cache11–130.0316%30 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0211%28 Jul
mirage13–9-0.009%28 Jul
nuke13–30.059%28 Jul
dust25–13-0.0323%27 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0623%27 Jul
cache13–5-0.058%27 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0427%26 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0218%26 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0918%26 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0416%26 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0316%25 Jul
mirage13–30.009%25 Jul
dust213–20.028%25 Jul
cache8–13-0.0110%25 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0116%24 Jul
nuke13–40.0521%24 Jul
cache13–90.0013%24 Jul
dust213–8-0.0410%24 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0421%23 Jul
ancient15–150.0114%23 Jul
anubis6–13-0.069%22 Jul
dust212–16-0.0523%22 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0521%22 Jul
cache10–13-0.0112%22 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0314%22 Jul
dust213–70.0111%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.086%22 Jul
dust22–13-0.1124%11 Jul
dust210–13-0.0212%10 Jul
cache13–10.047%10 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1013%10 Jul
dust216–12-0.0113%10 Jul
dust213–16-0.0411%9 Jul
cache13–40.0325%9 Jul
dust211–130.0916%9 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0733%8 Jul
overpass5–13-0.079%8 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0411%8 Jul
cache3–13-0.0510%8 Jul
dust29–130.0615%8 Jul
inferno13–90.0011%8 Jul
mirage6–13-0.027%8 Jul
nuke3–9-0.1511%7 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0015%7 Jul
office13–30.0119%7 Jul
cache13–6-0.0618%7 Jul
mirage2–13-0.050%6 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0512%6 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →