FaaVee — CS2 Stats

76561199152356355[U:1:1192090627]

842Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating23,504Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4758 of 20809 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,780 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

23,504Peak Premier on CSDB
1,780Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,780
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 221 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,504
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,496 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFaaVeeFACEITLevel 9 · 1,780 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,504 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,780csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning44
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5446Last 10054%Win rateLWLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.2
Aggression4.9
Utility7.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.4
Utility7.4
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time623ms−88ms
first ⅓ avg 711ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 10–13
130Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 15nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24111346%-0.02
cacheS2014670%0.01
mirageA1912763%0.01
infernoS1511473%0.04
ancientD134931%0.01
nukeD61517%-0.05
poseidon21150%0.01
debris1010%-0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

235Matches
56%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
75.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6349%0.9214.6
Dust25054%0.9715.5
Inferno2467%1.0715.7
Ancient1669%0.8813.1
Nuke944%0.7112.9
Overpass757%1.2022.4
Train580%0.7511.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.3%Spray accuracy
73.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
616msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.83HE damage / grenade
20.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.8961% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0436%26 Aug
poseidon9–70.0728%25 Aug
debris3–9-0.1512%25 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.0518%25 Aug
cache13–90.0237%25 Aug
dust213–10-0.0517%25 Aug
ancient11–130.0332%15 Aug
dust213–16-0.0120%15 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0017%15 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0723%15 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0623%13 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0610%13 Aug
ancient13–100.0113%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0329%9 Aug
dust213–90.0626%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0123%7 Aug
ancient4–130.0130%6 Aug
cache13–30.0021%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0634%5 Aug
ancient2–11-0.058%4 Aug
dust25–13-0.0136%1 Aug
dust213–80.0122%1 Aug
cache13–8-0.0131%1 Aug
cache13–4-0.0027%29 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0423%29 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0031%29 Jul
dust28–130.0333%29 Jul
dust26–13-0.0612%29 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0822%29 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0213%28 Jul
dust213–7-0.0511%28 Jul
cache13–70.0413%28 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0424%27 Jul
mirage13–50.0021%27 Jul
nuke1–130.0733%26 Jul
dust213–7-0.0326%26 Jul
inferno12–160.0820%26 Jul
inferno13–70.0428%26 Jul
cache6–00.0030%26 Jul
cache13–50.0421%26 Jul
nuke5–13-0.1121%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0319%25 Jul
mirage6–130.0913%25 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0220%24 Jul
dust28–13-0.0921%24 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0422%24 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0211%24 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0850%24 Jul
dust28–00.039%22 Jul
inferno13–20.0914%22 Jul
cache13–60.0222%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0527%22 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0218%22 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0622%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.0627%22 Jul
cache8–13-0.0220%19 Jul
dust24–13-0.0416%19 Jul
inferno13–110.0625%14 Jul
cache11–13-0.0421%14 Jul
ancient13–30.1135%14 Jul
dust211–13-0.0326%14 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0229%13 Jul
mirage10–130.1327%13 Jul
cache13–60.0322%13 Jul
cache13–80.0117%13 Jul
inferno13–80.0629%13 Jul
inferno13–70.1133%13 Jul
ancient11–130.0630%12 Jul
ancient13–50.0834%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0623%12 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0419%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0144%12 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0326%12 Jul
cache6–13-0.0412%12 Jul
cache13–00.0538%12 Jul
dust213–80.0120%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0225%11 Jul
inferno13–90.0421%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.0321%11 Jul
cache13–40.0318%11 Jul
dust23–13-0.0733%11 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0427%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0926%10 Jul
inferno13–40.0516%10 Jul
cache5–130.0216%10 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0221%10 Jul
inferno13–50.1127%10 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0219%10 Jul
cache13–60.0018%10 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0323%10 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0017%10 Jul
dust210–13-0.0915%9 Jul
inferno13–70.0515%9 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0431%9 Jul
dust213–40.0629%9 Jul
dust210–13-0.0626%9 Jul
dust213–9-0.0514%9 Jul
ancient9–130.0331%9 Jul
cache16–140.0512%9 Jul
mirage13–10.0519%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →