doughty — CS2 Stats

76561199132583287[U:1:1172317559]

1,770Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,157Pink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3247 of 8328 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,157Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,157
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,843 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdoughtyFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER21,157 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning51
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateWWLLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression5.5
Utility5.7
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time539ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 2–9
133Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 19% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25131252%-0.00
dust2A2415963%-0.01
infernoD1631319%0.00
nukeA127558%0.03
ancientA117464%0.00
cacheA74357%-0.02
anubisD51420%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

812Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
73.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12947%1.0514.6
Inferno5457%1.0514.5
Ancient5052%0.9514.7
Anubis4848%0.9513.4
Nuke4553%1.1614.1
Dust24149%0.9714.6
Vertigo3459%1.1615.5
Overpass944%1.1815.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
563msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
11.03HE damage / grenade
11.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6331% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–40.1317%27 Aug
dust213–11-0.0123%27 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0421%26 Aug
inferno14–160.0724%26 Aug
cache13–90.0326%26 Aug
mirage13–60.0623%26 Aug
nuke13–50.0428%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.0516%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0214%25 Aug
ancient13–30.1116%25 Aug
dust213–8-0.0138%25 Aug
dust213–7-0.0518%24 Aug
nuke13–100.0520%24 Aug
ancient13–100.0620%24 Aug
inferno6–130.0111%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0018%22 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0112%21 Aug
inferno13–70.0724%20 Aug
mirage2–00.000%19 Aug
cache13–7-0.0522%19 Aug
nuke3–50.0524%18 Aug
mirage11–130.0124%18 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0314%18 Aug
nuke13–100.029%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.0133%18 Aug
mirage8–130.0221%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0013%17 Aug
mirage6–130.0117%17 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0617%17 Aug
dust24–13-0.087%16 Aug
dust213–9-0.0123%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0620%16 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0023%13 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0915%13 Aug
inferno9–130.0129%13 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0420%12 Aug
dust213–30.0032%11 Aug
dust213–60.1332%9 Aug
dust213–8-0.0133%9 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0515%9 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0817%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0724%8 Aug
dust26–13-0.067%8 Aug
nuke9–130.0524%8 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0227%8 Aug
dust210–13-0.0136%5 Aug
dust213–60.0321%5 Aug
dust211–20.0529%5 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0220%5 Aug
mirage16–130.0014%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0217%5 Aug
cache8–13-0.0830%5 Aug
inferno2–90.1652%4 Aug
cache3–13-0.0833%4 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0336%4 Aug
inferno13–90.0313%4 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0114%4 Aug
nuke13–50.0820%3 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0216%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0615%2 Aug
dust213–60.0924%2 Aug
nuke4–130.0628%2 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0619%30 Jul
mirage11–130.0018%30 Jul
mirage13–90.0718%30 Jul
dust213–11-0.0421%30 Jul
mirage13–90.019%29 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0317%29 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0336%29 Jul
inferno10–130.0624%29 Jul
mirage13–40.0124%28 Jul
cache4–13-0.0116%28 Jul
dust213–5-0.0316%28 Jul
nuke3–13-0.1012%28 Jul
cache13–100.0121%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0018%27 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0412%27 Jul
anubis13–30.0916%27 Jul
ancient13–100.0236%27 Jul
dust213–80.0115%27 Jul
dust212–12-0.0221%27 Jul
dust27–1-0.0825%27 Jul
anubis9–130.0622%27 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0716%26 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0234%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0014%26 Jul
inferno6–130.0211%26 Jul
dust213–100.0115%26 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0431%26 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0611%26 Jul
inferno7–130.0325%26 Jul
cache13–100.0219%26 Jul
dust210–130.0016%26 Jul
dust210–13-0.0119%26 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0113%24 Jul
ancient13–110.0417%24 Jul
anubis6–130.0319%22 Jul
mirage13–70.009%22 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0219%22 Jul
mirage8–130.0113%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →