quitz`

quitz` — CS2 Stats

IL76561199127842160[U:1:1167576432]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,572Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,894 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGquitz`FACEITLevel 10 · 1,894 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning56
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5050Last 10050%Win rateWWLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5
Aggression8.1
Utility5.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time644ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy26.9%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–4
130Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%0.01
dust2A1811761%0.00
infernoC1771041%0.01
ancientB157847%0.01
nukeS128467%0.02
anubisC52340%0.00
overpass41325%-0.03
train1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,415Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
83.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage44358%1.2118.4
Dust225746%1.0616.9
Ancient20844%0.9916.6
Inferno17646%1.0817.0
Nuke15146%1.0918.0
Anubis6255%0.9815.6
Overpass4358%1.1119.1
Train933%0.8614.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.1%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
655msReaction time
28.5%T opening success
60.2%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
7.97HE damage / grenade
12.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.5042% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0417%28 Aug
mirage13–80.0122%16 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0453%12 Aug
nuke16–140.0220%11 Aug
anubis17–190.0537%7 Aug
dust216–120.0238%6 Aug
nuke13–80.0215%6 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0318%1 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0119%1 Aug
inferno13–110.0520%1 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0343%19 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0143%18 Jul
mirage13–40.0419%18 Jul
anubis13–90.0139%18 Jul
nuke13–90.0829%17 Jul
inferno13–40.1427%11 Jul
dust213–70.0329%8 Jul
mirage13–20.0438%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0422%27 Jun
mirage12–160.0223%25 Jun
overpass6–130.0329%13 Jun
nuke13–70.0221%13 Jun
dust211–13-0.0419%12 Jun
mirage13–90.0426%10 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0135%7 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0818%6 Jun
nuke19–17-0.0816%4 Jun
dust219–160.0423%3 Jun
mirage13–60.1127%2 Jun
inferno20–220.0230%2 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0313%1 Jun
ancient5–130.0924%31 May
ancient4–13-0.0436%24 May
inferno9–13-0.0721%22 May
overpass1–13-0.0724%15 May
nuke13–40.0829%13 May
dust213–80.0540%13 May
ancient13–60.0040%12 May
dust213–11-0.0229%12 May
nuke11–13-0.0638%11 May
inferno13–6-0.0021%10 May
nuke13–160.0437%10 May
inferno13–00.0729%10 May
inferno11–13-0.0226%7 May
mirage10–13-0.0424%1 May
mirage7–13-0.0431%30 Apr
mirage19–160.0316%30 Apr
dust213–11-0.0227%21 Apr
ancient11–130.0427%13 Apr
mirage9–130.0215%10 Apr
dust210–13-0.0022%7 Apr
anubis9–130.0124%3 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0319%1 Apr
dust25–13-0.0122%1 Apr
dust26–13-0.0736%25 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0228%23 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0418%22 Mar
mirage3–130.0335%22 Mar
ancient13–160.0324%10 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0517%9 Mar
dust28–13-0.0152%27 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0424%27 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0139%25 Feb
dust213–10-0.0121%20 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0020%20 Feb
mirage13–10.0312%20 Feb
ancient16–130.0117%17 Feb
nuke13–110.1231%17 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0024%16 Feb
mirage13–110.0118%16 Feb
ancient11–130.0122%15 Feb
inferno6–130.0720%13 Feb
nuke13–110.0225%21 Jan
mirage13–8-0.048%21 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0010%17 Jan
mirage16–19-0.0229%14 Jan
inferno13–50.1327%30 Dec
inferno13–6-0.0128%23 Dec
dust231–290.0423%3 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0432%28 Nov
dust213–30.1031%11 Jul
dust213–50.0217%11 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0515%10 Jul
ancient16–130.037%7 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0326%7 Jul
dust213–80.0936%3 Jul
dust210–13-0.1313%1 Jul
ancient6–130.0924%1 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0133%30 Jun
nuke9–130.0226%30 Jun
ancient13–40.1016%30 Jun
mirage9–130.0525%30 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0113%28 Jun
dust29–130.0018%27 Jun
inferno7–130.0211%27 Jun
inferno13–160.0220%26 Jun
mirage13–30.0119%25 Jun
mirage13–100.1017%24 Jun
train10–13-0.0025%24 Jun
nuke7–130.0024%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →