Hoover — CS2 Stats

US76561199126592586[U:1:1166326858]Steam profile ↗

592Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 Solid

Premier CS Rating15,754Purple band · top ~25.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3364 of 5354 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning53

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateWLLWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression6.2

Utility5.8

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch6.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning5.3

Utility5.8

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time602ms+16ms

first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms

Headshot accuracy12.9%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 10–1

13–2Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 42% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	26	16–10	62%	0.03
nuke	A	21	12–9	57%	0.01
inferno	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.01
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	0.03
cache	S	10	7–3	70%	0.01
dust2	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	0.00
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

48Matches

50%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

84.4ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	18	33%	1.02	15.8
Nuke	8	50%	1.11	16.4
Inferno	7	29%	1.00	14.6
Cache	5	60%	1.02	15.6
Ancient	4	100%	0.96	16.5
Dust2	3	100%	1.18	19.7
Anubis	2	50%	1.22	22.5
Overpass	1	100%	1.43	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy

37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.0%Spray accuracy

74.1%Counter-strafing

11.3°Preaim

612msReaction time

32.4%T opening success

52.6%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

4.6%Flash assists

9.64HE damage / grenade

13.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.3116% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.3793% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–9	0.01	11%	2 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.00	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	6%	26 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.10	4%	25 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.00	16%	25 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.01	10%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	0%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	19%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	18%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	10%	25 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	17%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	26%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.00	13%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	12%	21 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	20%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	16%	21 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.06	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	13%	20 Jul →
ancient	7–2	0.00	5%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	10%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	22%	19 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.07	15%	19 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	7%	19 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	13%	19 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.02	13%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	11%	15 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.01	4%	15 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.06	10%	14 Jul →
mirage	10–1	0.23	11%	14 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.01	7%	13 Jul →
nuke	16–13	-0.02	11%	12 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	11%	12 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	14%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.13	16%	12 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.01	14%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	15%	12 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	19%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.06	13%	11 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	13%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	12%	11 Jul →
inferno	6–9	0.04	29%	11 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.00	15%	10 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	33%	9 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	11%	9 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.07	21%	9 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	16%	9 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	30%	7 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.01	14%	7 Jul →
cache	6–0	0.06	31%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.08	10%	6 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	21%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	12%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	21%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	10%	5 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.01	12%	5 Jul →
ancient	11–1	0.00	18%	5 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	17%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.12	15%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	20%	29 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.05	7%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	14%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	16%	26 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	5%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.02	18%	24 Jun →
overpass	13–10	-0.03	14%	24 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.09	13%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.01	19%	23 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.03	19%	23 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.06	16%	23 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.03	10%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	5%	23 Jun →
inferno	8–8	0.06	14%	23 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	10%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.10	16%	23 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.04	10%	22 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.00	7%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.07	17%	21 Jun →
cache	16–12	-0.01	5%	21 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	10%	20 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.07	16%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.06	23%	20 Jun →
inferno	9–6	0.04	10%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	15%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	9%	20 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	8%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.11	17%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.03	18%	19 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	6%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.04	4%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.14	15%	18 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.05	12%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.09	12%	17 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	9%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.07	9%	14 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	9%	14 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.07	19%	14 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	9%	14 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.09	9%	13 Jun →