LTbuford — CS2 Stats
76561199123744432[U:1:1163478704]Steam profile ↗
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like b1t 86% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 667ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 51 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | S | 14 | 12–2 | 86% | 0.03 |
 nuke | B | 12 | 6–6 | 50% | 0.01 |
 dust2 | D | 11 | 1–10 | 9% | -0.01 |
 inferno | S | 10 | 7–3 | 70% | 0.03 |
 train | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.02 |
 ancient | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.07 |
 vertigo | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.04 |
Across the last 51 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferno | 2 | 50% | 0.82 | 13.5 |
| Dust2 | 1 | 0% | 1.00 | 15.0 |
| Nuke | 1 | 0% | 0.44 | 8.0 |
| Mirage | 1 | 0% | 0.76 | 13.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.6329% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 10–13 | -0.04 | 25% | 1 Mar → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.01 | 12% | 1 Mar → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | -0.02 | 20% | 22 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.08 | 24% | 22 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | -0.00 | 29% | 22 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.09 | 35% | 22 Feb → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.05 | 11% | 15 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.03 | 37% | 15 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.11 | 7% | 15 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | 0.01 | 27% | 15 Feb → | |
| mirage | 12–7 | -0.02 | 25% | 15 Feb → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.02 | 11% | 15 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.03 | 11% | 14 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.07 | 16% | 14 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.01 | 20% | 14 Feb → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | 0.02 | 24% | 14 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–11 | 0.06 | 16% | 14 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | 0.03 | 16% | 12 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.05 | 24% | 12 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.12 | 29% | 12 Feb → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 12 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 3–9 | -0.05 | 8% | 11 Feb → | |
| mirage | 16–12 | -0.00 | 17% | 9 Feb → | |
| nuke | 14–16 | -0.02 | 17% | 9 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–16 | -0.02 | 21% | 9 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | -0.05 | 12% | 9 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.03 | 26% | 8 Feb → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | -0.04 | 13% | 8 Feb → | |
| inferno | 5–13 | 0.06 | 20% | 8 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.14 | 13% | 8 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | -0.01 | 20% | 8 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.06 | 23% | 8 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | -0.01 | 21% | 8 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 15–15 | 0.01 | 20% | 5 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–5 | 0.06 | 22% | 1 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.03 | 20% | 26 Jan → | |
| inferno | 13–4 | -0.01 | 19% | 26 Jan → | |
| ancient | 13–2 | 0.07 | 12% | 26 Jan → | |
| train | 13–8 | -0.04 | 33% | 26 Jan → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 25 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.03 | 27% | 25 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.01 | 27% | 25 Jan → | |
| nuke | 12–0 | 0.02 | 45% | 25 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | -0.03 | 25% | 25 Jan → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.03 | 14% | 24 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 3–6 | 0.00 | 0% | 28 Dec → | |
| inferno | 10–13 | 0.02 | 22% | 7 Dec → | |
| train | 0–2 | 0.00 | 0% | 14 Nov → | |
| vertigo | 5–6 | -0.04 | 14% | 9 Nov → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | 0.04 | 29% | 1 Nov → | |
| dust2 | 3–13 | 0.01 | 33% | 1 Nov → |
Match data via Leetify.
