Terpslammer

Terpslammer — CS2 Stats

76561199122127090[U:1:1161861362]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

627Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,195Blue band · top ~38% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25285 of 38040 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTerpslammerFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,195 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning47
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39529Last 10039%Win rateLLLWWWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression6.1
Utility3.8
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.5

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.7
Utility3.8
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time632ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy25.7%−5.5%
first ⅓ avg 31.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — inferno 9–2
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7cacheWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD43142933%0.00
nukeC25101540%-0.01
mirageA85363%-0.01
vertigoS75271%-0.02
cacheD51420%0.01
dust2C52340%-0.00
eldorado31233%0.00
train21150%0.03
anubis1010%0.01
ancient1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches
42%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
ADR
66%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke540%0.7812.6
Dust2475%1.1212.3
Vertigo333%0.579.0
Mirage30%0.8214.0
Anubis20%0.6813.0
Inferno1100%0.628.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.1%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
613msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
9.26HE damage / grenade
4.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1647% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
eldorado5–90.0732%28 Aug
nuke6–90.0428%28 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0040%28 Aug
vertigo9–10.1156%28 Aug
nuke9–50.1123%27 Aug
cache13–30.0638%27 Aug
dust215–15-0.0222%27 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0014%27 Aug
nuke5–9-0.0123%27 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0626%27 Aug
nuke9–10.1415%27 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0824%27 Aug
anubis15–150.0123%27 Aug
mirage13–00.0224%27 Aug
dust25–130.0031%27 Aug
nuke5–9-0.1027%26 Aug
inferno2–9-0.0312%26 Aug
vertigo9–40.0914%26 Aug
inferno7–90.1136%26 Aug
cache10–130.0526%26 Aug
cache8–130.0021%26 Aug
cache7–13-0.0710%26 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0513%26 Aug
dust213–70.0134%26 Aug
inferno9–40.0932%23 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.1332%23 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0320%23 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0516%23 Aug
inferno9–10.2432%23 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0728%23 Aug
inferno5–9-0.1222%23 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0631%20 Aug
inferno9–60.0824%20 Aug
vertigo9–40.1019%20 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0131%20 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0326%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0425%20 Aug
inferno1–9-0.0333%19 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0122%19 Aug
dust213–5-0.0132%19 Aug
inferno9–20.3053%19 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1143%19 Aug
nuke7–90.0334%19 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0532%19 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0631%19 Aug
inferno8–80.0635%19 Aug
vertigo9–6-0.0120%19 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0320%14 Aug
train13–70.0931%14 Aug
vertigo0–9-0.2943%14 Aug
inferno9–30.0615%14 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0333%14 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0338%13 Aug
nuke2–9-0.1410%13 Aug
nuke9–30.0922%13 Aug
train12–12-0.0317%13 Aug
dust21–70.000%9 Aug
inferno4–90.0324%9 Aug
eldorado9–6-0.0942%9 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0230%9 Aug
inferno5–90.0128%9 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0927%8 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0525%8 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0333%8 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0440%8 Aug
inferno9–20.2321%8 Aug
inferno9–40.039%8 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0418%8 Aug
nuke13–20.0138%8 Aug
nuke9–00.0327%8 Aug
inferno8–80.0315%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0730%7 Aug
nuke13–60.0428%7 Aug
nuke8–130.0224%7 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0323%7 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0138%7 Aug
eldorado5–90.0346%7 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0110%6 Aug
inferno8–80.0022%6 Aug
inferno9–4-0.0545%6 Aug
inferno9–70.0729%6 Aug
inferno9–7-0.1056%6 Aug
mirage10–130.0432%6 Aug
cache13–160.0126%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0129%6 Aug
inferno7–90.1533%6 Aug
nuke2–9-0.0925%6 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0920%6 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0633%6 Aug
inferno9–10.2350%6 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0122%6 Aug
nuke7–9-0.178%6 Aug
inferno9–0-0.1775%6 Aug
nuke9–7-0.0125%5 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1337%5 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0148%5 Aug
inferno1–9-0.189%5 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0432%5 Aug
vertigo9–4-0.0136%4 Aug
inferno9–30.1442%4 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →