Dikiwawa — CS2 Stats

76561199120184432[U:1:1159918704]

918Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,470Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1302 of 15825 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDikiwawaFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,470 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning40
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49456Last 10049%Win rateWWTLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7
Aggression7.6
Utility5.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 47 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning4.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time561ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy26.9%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 12–12
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 12mirageWeakest map · 39% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC29121741%0.01
mirageC2391439%0.01
cacheB136746%0.02
ancientS129375%0.02
anubisA116555%0.03
nukeA53260%-0.04
dust242250%0.00
vertigo1010%0.00
debris110100%-0.02
overpass110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

435Matches
54%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
90.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15851%1.3119.4
Vertigo9467%1.4018.8
Inferno6859%1.2418.6
Ancient4533%1.0915.3
Anubis2638%1.1417.5
Nuke1735%1.1716.8
Dust21573%1.3117.6
Overpass1258%1.1519.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.6%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
72.2%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
537msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
11.58HE damage / grenade
5.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6666% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–20.0319%28 Aug
inferno13–110.0830%27 Aug
inferno8–80.0422%27 Aug
mirage0–8-0.1450%26 Aug
anubis13–90.0016%25 Aug
mirage13–50.1525%25 Aug
ancient13–100.1323%25 Aug
mirage10–130.0038%25 Aug
anubis16–130.1422%24 Aug
dust26–130.0134%24 Aug
cache7–13-0.0422%24 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0224%24 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0430%24 Aug
cache13–110.0056%24 Aug
mirage11–130.0628%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0030%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0412%20 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0423%20 Aug
mirage13–60.0526%18 Aug
inferno13–70.0729%18 Aug
ancient13–60.0733%18 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0722%17 Aug
mirage10–130.0016%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0216%13 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0020%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0617%12 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0136%10 Aug
inferno1–9-0.0222%10 Aug
vertigo7–90.0033%9 Aug
inferno8–8-0.1026%9 Aug
inferno9–30.0423%9 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0237%8 Aug
dust216–140.0627%7 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0435%6 Aug
anubis13–110.0121%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0222%3 Aug
anubis13–100.0326%3 Aug
inferno13–80.0024%1 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0364%30 Jul
mirage13–70.0328%29 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0228%28 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0123%28 Jul
mirage5–130.0128%27 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0423%26 Jul
inferno16–120.1223%26 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0219%26 Jul
mirage10–130.0325%26 Jul
inferno13–110.1238%26 Jul
mirage11–130.0927%26 Jul
anubis5–130.0225%26 Jul
dust212–160.0032%26 Jul
cache5–13-0.0830%25 Jul
mirage11–130.0327%25 Jul
inferno13–40.0723%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0340%25 Jul
ancient13–80.0527%25 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0030%25 Jul
inferno11–130.0824%25 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0238%25 Jul
anubis6–130.0631%25 Jul
debris9–5-0.0215%20 Jul
inferno6–130.0425%16 Jul
inferno13–80.0218%16 Jul
cache13–60.0110%15 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0524%14 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0711%14 Jul
anubis13–60.0928%14 Jul
mirage11–130.0127%14 Jul
cache13–100.0322%14 Jul
ancient13–70.1414%14 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0218%12 Jul
cache13–60.0325%12 Jul
mirage13–80.1032%12 Jul
cache12–120.1639%7 Jul
cache12–120.0429%7 Jul
ancient1–13-0.049%5 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0424%5 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0115%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.059%26 Jun
inferno13–110.0223%24 Jun
overpass13–60.0626%24 Jun
inferno3–9-0.0721%24 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0919%24 Jun
cache12–12-0.0021%24 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0226%24 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0322%23 Jun
mirage13–50.0223%23 Jun
cache12–120.0829%22 Jun
inferno9–130.0426%22 Jun
cache13–100.0127%22 Jun
anubis11–130.0425%22 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0225%22 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0120%21 Jun
inferno13–100.0225%21 Jun
dust213–10-0.0721%21 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0621%21 Jun
cache9–130.0243%21 Jun
inferno8–130.0019%21 Jun
anubis16–120.0321%20 Jun
cache13–110.0124%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →