CSGOLover1963 — CS2 Stats

76561199119841451[U:1:1159575723]✓ No bans

2,276Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,853Blue band · top ~29.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29396 of 47761 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,115 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

14,853Peak Premier on CSDB
1,115Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,115
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 86 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,853
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 147 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCSGOLover1963FACEITLevel 5 · 1,115 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,853 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,115csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning46
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47503Last 10047%Win rateWWLLLTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression5.7
Utility4.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 683ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.6
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time688ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 696ms → last ⅓ avg 688ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–4
132Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28131546%0.00
mirageB178947%0.00
ancientB147750%0.01
anubisC125742%-0.01
nukeA116555%0.02
infernoC83538%-0.02
cacheC52340%0.01
overpassA53260%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

126Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
78.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3540%1.0415.3
Dust22357%1.0215.7
Inferno1963%1.0417.2
Anubis1354%1.0616.5
Nuke1275%1.0714.3
Vertigo1030%1.4117.8
Ancient838%0.9116.0
Overpass3100%0.9114.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
683msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
44.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
6.65HE damage / grenade
7.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.4591% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0929%23 Aug
ancient13–100.0425%23 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0124%22 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0421%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0117%20 Aug
mirage15–150.0018%20 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0124%19 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0713%8 Aug
ancient13–80.0521%8 Aug
dust211–130.0115%8 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0839%4 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0414%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0516%4 Aug
dust213–20.0625%4 Aug
dust213–7-0.0627%3 Aug
cache16–12-0.0122%3 Aug
dust23–13-0.0824%3 Aug
dust213–50.0426%3 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0029%3 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0215%3 Aug
nuke13–80.0827%30 Jul
nuke5–130.0115%29 Jul
ancient13–70.1122%29 Jul
dust210–13-0.0226%29 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0613%29 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0325%29 Jul
dust213–8-0.0121%28 Jul
anubis13–100.0024%28 Jul
nuke6–130.0314%27 Jul
anubis9–1-0.0810%27 Jul
dust210–130.0318%27 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0229%22 Jul
cache9–130.0117%22 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0328%21 Jul
cache5–130.0019%20 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0113%20 Jul
dust213–50.0129%11 Jul
dust213–4-0.0519%11 Jul
cache13–50.0429%11 Jul
ancient13–90.0726%11 Jul
cache6–13-0.0038%11 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0731%6 Jul
dust20–2-0.030%5 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0231%5 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0227%5 Jul
inferno13–110.0117%3 Jul
mirage13–50.0815%3 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0514%3 Jul
dust213–10-0.0316%29 Jun
dust28–13-0.0026%29 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0326%24 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0126%24 Jun
mirage15–150.0118%21 Jun
overpass13–50.0128%21 Jun
mirage13–110.0320%17 Jun
dust27–130.0023%15 Jun
anubis13–110.0222%15 Jun
anubis10–130.0618%14 Jun
inferno13–100.0133%14 Jun
dust213–90.0216%10 Jun
mirage13–90.0124%10 Jun
mirage10–130.0224%9 Jun
anubis9–130.0226%9 Jun
dust213–40.0531%7 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0335%4 Jun
dust28–13-0.0622%2 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0428%2 Jun
dust27–130.0121%2 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0436%1 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0321%1 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0318%1 Jun
dust26–130.0032%30 May
inferno13–10-0.0818%29 May
mirage10–130.0319%20 May
dust213–50.0515%20 May
overpass5–13-0.0224%20 May
dust28–13-0.0515%19 May
overpass13–5-0.0520%19 May
dust28–13-0.0113%19 May
mirage14–160.0122%19 May
dust213–50.0416%18 May
nuke13–100.0222%18 May
nuke13–90.0416%18 May
nuke13–90.0226%12 May
ancient13–100.1123%12 May
dust213–100.0121%12 May
overpass11–13-0.0433%12 May
dust29–13-0.0518%12 May
anubis7–13-0.0315%11 May
ancient13–50.0126%11 May
mirage13–20.1025%11 May
anubis13–40.1211%11 May
dust210–130.0225%9 May
nuke13–50.0530%9 May
dust210–130.0024%5 May
mirage15–150.0020%5 May
overpass13–30.1022%5 May
nuke4–13-0.0013%4 May
anubis11–13-0.0620%3 May
inferno5–13-0.0217%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →