DIN4ZIN — CS2 Stats

FR76561199117796245[U:1:1157530517]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,871Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,800Top 10% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2514 of 57332 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,639 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning59

Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateWWLWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression8.6

Utility7.6

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning5.9

Utility7.6

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time520ms−86ms

first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms

Headshot accuracy26.7%+2.9%

first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — ancient 13–6

13–0Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 38% over 29

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	29	11–18	38%	0.04
ancient	S	20	13–7	65%	0.05
inferno	B	15	7–8	47%	0.03
mirage	B	12	6–6	50%	0.03
cache	S	9	6–3	67%	0.04
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	0.06
nuke	S	7	5–2	71%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,641Matches

52%Win rate

1.34Avg K/D

86.7ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	332	53%	1.37	18.3
Inferno	294	55%	1.56	19.6
Ancient	290	53%	1.34	18.5
Dust2	253	50%	1.17	17.0
Mirage	161	43%	1.14	16.4
Nuke	116	47%	1.26	18.3
Vertigo	80	56%	1.25	17.9
Overpass	60	55%	1.58	20.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy

39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.2%Spray accuracy

81.0%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

516msReaction time

28.8%T opening success

61.1%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

8.6%Flash assists

8.95HE damage / grenade

20.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.7563% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–11	0.15	25%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.11	33%	30 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.07	24%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.09	16%	30 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	33%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	29%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.05	38%	29 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	38%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.04	24%	28 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.13	27%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	28%	28 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.04	16%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.06	47%	28 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	27%	27 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.14	35%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	29%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.14	28%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.15	25%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	20%	27 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.10	15%	26 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.09	21%	23 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.05	31%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	47%	23 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	11%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.03	23%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	25%	18 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.03	27%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.07	26%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	25%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.13	28%	16 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	7%	16 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.07	25%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.13	28%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	25%	16 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.06	28%	15 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	30%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	22%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.05	17%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.07	25%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.11	10%	14 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.04	12%	13 Aug →
inferno	2–6	-0.07	33%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	25%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	25%	12 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	17%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	27%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	26%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	32%	11 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.11	20%	10 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	29%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.08	24%	9 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	21%	8 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.14	22%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.03	13%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.10	17%	8 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.08	22%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.09	39%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.09	28%	6 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.09	20%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.10	22%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.18	18%	6 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.14	23%	6 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.07	11%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	16%	5 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.00	22%	4 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	23%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	34%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.12	24%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.11	19%	4 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	19%	4 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	26%	17 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.08	27%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.01	26%	17 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	13%	16 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	18%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.06	26%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.07	21%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.16	18%	15 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.03	22%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.02	57%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	21%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.06	19%	15 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.03	16%	15 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.00	19%	15 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	27%	13 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	20%	13 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.10	21%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.07	22%	13 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	25%	13 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.01	36%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	36%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	15%	12 Jul →
ancient	7–3	0.07	23%	12 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.02	30%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.07	15%	11 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.06	14%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	28%	10 Jul →