MF | Chicken Strike — CS2 Stats

76561199117543200[U:1:1157277472]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,246Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.4 Learning

Premier CS Rating11,006Blue band · top ~49.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9212 of 12782 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim27

Positioning44

Utility8

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateWLLWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.7

Aggression5.4

Utility0.8

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels2.3

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 785ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.7

Positioning4.4

Utility0.8

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact8.3

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time781ms+21ms

first ⅓ avg 760ms → last ⅓ avg 781ms

Headshot accuracy14.7%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — anubis 13–5

13–2Biggest win — cache

10Longest win streak

14–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 81% over 16ancientWeakest map · 42% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	30	16–14	53%	-0.04
ancient	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.03
cache	S	17	11–6	65%	-0.02
anubis	S	16	13–3	81%	-0.02
dust2	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.03
nuke	—	4	4–0	100%	-0.01
inferno	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy

32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.7%Spray accuracy

68.4%Counter-strafing

11.7°Preaim

785msReaction time

22.2%T opening success

56.3%CT opening success

0.27Enemies flashed / flash

2.2%Flash assists

1.83HE damage / grenade

0.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.9478% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Settings
Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.
Reaction time 784.7969ms — above the 700ms mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2722 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–8	0.00	18%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	9%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.08	21%	14 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.02	29%	14 Aug →
cache	16–12	-0.03	24%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	10%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	13%	10 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.07	5%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	17%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	11%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.05	10%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	41%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	7%	7 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	20%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.00	17%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	10%	7 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.02	24%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	13%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	9%	31 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	15%	31 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	18%	31 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	14%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.07	15%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.07	9%	31 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	8%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.03	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	6%	29 Jul →
anubis	16–13	-0.02	13%	28 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	17%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	16%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	14%	27 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.08	13%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	11%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	9%	26 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.03	6%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.07	8%	26 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.03	19%	26 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.02	12%	26 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.10	8%	26 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	9%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	19%	26 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.10	9%	26 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.05	15%	25 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	14%	24 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.03	12%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	19%	24 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	16%	24 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	15%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	7%	24 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.04	17%	24 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.00	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.09	25%	23 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.02	17%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	18%	21 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.06	9%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.09	4%	21 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.00	22%	20 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.02	8%	19 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	15%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	10%	19 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	15%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	21%	19 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	0%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	32%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	16%	18 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.05	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	7%	18 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	22%	18 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.02	25%	18 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.00	33%	17 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.05	28%	16 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.06	10%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.01	14%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	22%	16 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	23%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	14%	16 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	20%	16 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	4%	16 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	22%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	17%	15 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	18%	15 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.08	19%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	12%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.05	11%	14 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	16%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	28%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.06	15%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.01	9%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.08	11%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	10%	13 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	11%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	4%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	8%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	14%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	17%	12 Jul →