NoSpecter

NoSpecter — CS2 Stats

76561199100083268[U:1:1139817540]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,622Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,647 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNoSpecterFACEITLevel 7 · 1,647 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning53
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateWLLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression3.9
Utility5.9
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time614ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–8
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
814In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 81% over 16anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B21101148%0.01
nukeB189950%0.02
mirageS1613381%0.02
infernoA169756%0.01
ancientC167944%0.04
anubisD103730%0.01
cache2020%0.01
overpass1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

217Matches
53%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
85.1ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4760%1.1918.4
Anubis4347%1.2016.6
Mirage3855%1.0215.5
Inferno2854%1.1317.0
Dust22544%1.0415.0
Nuke1867%1.2617.9
Overpass967%1.2020.7
Cache50%0.9316.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
618msReaction time
23.6%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
10.97HE damage / grenade
7.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.6485% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0217%27 Jul
cache9–130.0421%27 Jul
anubis12–160.0028%25 Jul
nuke13–50.0911%21 Jul
nuke13–110.0711%17 Jul
dust210–40.0027%15 Jul
nuke7–13-0.047%15 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0514%13 Jul
dust211–130.0314%13 Jul
dust213–90.0917%11 Jul
cache4–13-0.0129%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.0625%5 Jul
anubis7–130.0211%4 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0113%3 Jul
ancient11–130.0021%3 Jul
dust213–50.0718%2 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0222%1 Jul
ancient13–160.0021%1 Jul
nuke11–130.0223%30 Jun
anubis13–70.0716%30 Jun
nuke13–80.0323%29 Jun
dust213–8-0.038%29 Jun
dust27–13-0.0120%28 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0527%27 Jun
dust213–5-0.0114%27 Jun
dust29–130.0216%26 Jun
dust213–11-0.0424%26 Jun
mirage13–50.0919%25 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0313%25 Jun
mirage13–40.0525%24 Jun
nuke7–130.0237%24 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0125%24 Jun
dust29–13-0.0221%24 Jun
ancient5–130.1014%23 Jun
dust27–130.0926%23 Jun
dust213–90.0020%23 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0115%23 Jun
mirage13–50.0011%23 Jun
ancient11–130.0320%22 Jun
mirage13–110.0627%22 Jun
inferno15–150.0526%22 Jun
inferno13–80.1632%22 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0211%21 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0420%21 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0211%20 Jun
inferno13–50.1023%20 Jun
ancient13–100.0516%20 Jun
nuke13–70.0224%20 Jun
nuke11–130.0421%20 Jun
ancient13–70.0029%20 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0517%19 Jun
nuke14–160.0115%19 Jun
nuke13–60.0314%18 Jun
inferno13–70.0621%18 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0132%17 Jun
dust211–13-0.0214%17 Jun
dust215–15-0.0019%17 Jun
mirage16–120.0422%17 Jun
mirage13–40.0523%17 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0018%16 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0310%16 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0121%15 Jun
mirage13–110.0724%14 Jun
dust213–11-0.0119%14 Jun
ancient13–80.1220%14 Jun
ancient13–90.1123%13 Jun
anubis13–60.0215%13 Jun
anubis11–130.0120%13 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0117%13 Jun
anubis11–130.0217%13 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0621%13 Jun
nuke13–60.1122%12 Jun
mirage16–130.0019%11 Jun
inferno13–90.0110%11 Jun
ancient11–130.0221%11 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0314%10 Jun
ancient13–100.0718%10 Jun
dust211–130.0133%9 Jun
nuke13–40.0528%9 Jun
mirage13–50.0718%8 Jun
dust213–9-0.0520%8 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0123%4 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0218%4 Jun
dust210–130.0320%4 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0421%3 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0316%3 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0028%31 May
dust25–130.0237%30 May
inferno16–130.0515%29 May
ancient6–13-0.0128%22 May
inferno13–9-0.0226%22 May
ancient10–130.0626%22 May
anubis13–30.0420%22 May
ancient11–130.0418%22 May
ancient10–13-0.0115%22 May
mirage13–11-0.0314%21 May
inferno13–80.0120%21 May
nuke13–20.0619%21 May
inferno9–13-0.0022%21 May
ancient13–80.0914%20 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →