Lick Him Up — CS2 Stats

76561199093325829[U:1:1133060101]

1,083Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,071Purple band · top ~20.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23207 of 43546 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLick Him UpPREMIER17,071 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning30
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateWWLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression3.1
Utility5.2
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning3.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time599ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy14.6%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 11.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 9–2
130Biggest win — train
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB34181653%-0.02
anubisD1431121%-0.03
dust2B115645%-0.02
cacheS108280%-0.02
nukeC83538%-0.06
mirageA74357%-0.00
ancientB63350%-0.01
poseidon31233%0.00
train330100%0.04
overpass21150%-0.02
debris1010%-0.09
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches
56%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
64.7ADR
26%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24100%0.6711.0
Anubis20%0.6211.0
Mirage10%0.7814.0
Inferno10%0.7112.0
Cache1100%1.1925.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
591msReaction time
20.4%T opening success
35.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
7.07HE damage / grenade
7.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.481% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.3942% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.0313%28 Aug
ancient13–80.0312%28 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0421%28 Aug
cache13–60.0623%28 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0611%27 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0919%27 Aug
inferno9–50.1123%25 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0611%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.039%23 Aug
debris4–9-0.0920%23 Aug
poseidon5–9-0.039%23 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0023%23 Aug
mirage13–70.1117%23 Aug
cache13–6-0.0718%23 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0118%22 Aug
ancient2–13-0.077%22 Aug
dust213–60.0313%22 Aug
ancient7–130.0216%22 Aug
dust22–13-0.090%22 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0112%22 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0712%21 Aug
inferno4–13-0.1010%21 Aug
inferno13–30.0717%20 Aug
train13–50.0625%20 Aug
inferno9–60.0115%19 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0213%18 Aug
train13–90.0420%17 Aug
anubis4–13-0.097%16 Aug
overpass9–70.0120%16 Aug
nuke8–13-0.107%16 Aug
nuke5–9-0.0723%16 Aug
poseidon9–40.1015%16 Aug
ancient13–8-0.062%16 Aug
inferno5–9-0.196%15 Aug
cache13–10-0.0112%14 Aug
anubis7–13-0.025%14 Aug
train13–00.0110%14 Aug
dust216–13-0.0415%13 Aug
inferno7–90.0216%13 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0712%12 Aug
inferno13–30.0815%12 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0611%12 Aug
anubis10–13-0.029%11 Aug
inferno9–4-0.0620%11 Aug
inferno3–9-0.099%11 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0525%10 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0613%10 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0415%9 Aug
overpass1–13-0.059%9 Aug
anubis14–16-0.088%9 Aug
dust211–13-0.019%9 Aug
inferno8–80.0315%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0211%7 Aug
cache13–9-0.0611%7 Aug
inferno9–60.0711%7 Aug
inferno13–10-0.037%6 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0632%6 Aug
inferno13–7-0.059%5 Aug
inferno9–7-0.136%5 Aug
dust213–40.0121%4 Aug
anubis6–130.0011%3 Aug
anubis15–15-0.048%3 Aug
dust21–13-0.1113%3 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0218%2 Aug
inferno9–60.0215%2 Aug
ancient13–40.029%31 Jul
cache13–30.0118%30 Jul
cache2–13-0.0613%28 Jul
inferno9–20.1721%28 Jul
inferno0–9-0.170%26 Jul
inferno9–4-0.018%26 Jul
poseidon4–9-0.0611%25 Jul
inferno7–90.0216%25 Jul
inferno9–20.2016%25 Jul
inferno8–13-0.033%25 Jul
inferno9–30.0112%25 Jul
inferno2–9-0.0618%24 Jul
inferno9–10.0013%24 Jul
inferno9–5-0.0326%24 Jul
inferno6–9-0.076%23 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0114%23 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0817%22 Jul
cache13–60.037%22 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0213%22 Jul
dust214–160.0418%20 Jul
dust25–13-0.085%18 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0613%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.034%18 Jul
dust216–14-0.0210%18 Jul
mirage13–60.0510%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.0517%18 Jul
dust216–12-0.0012%18 Jul
dust26–130.0414%18 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0311%17 Jul
cache13–4-0.043%17 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0114%16 Jul
inferno13–11-0.002%16 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0529%16 Jul
anubis13–5-0.007%16 Jul
anubis8–130.013%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →