gwrls.exe

gwrls.exe — CS2 Stats

76561199092916073[U:1:1132650345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,008Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,108Purple band · top ~16% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14774 of 29125 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,202 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgwrls.exeFACEITLevel 6 · 1,202 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,108 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning48
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression4.7
Utility4.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time581ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 10–0
131Biggest win — vertigo
5Longest win streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 12ancientWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2581732%-0.02
nukeD1551033%-0.04
dust2B157847%0.01
ancientD134931%-0.01
infernoS1210283%0.02
anubisC94544%-0.02
cacheS54180%0.02
vertigo42250%-0.03
overpass21150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

722Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
75.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19157%1.0315.3
Dust214847%0.9914.2
Anubis10652%1.0514.5
Ancient10549%1.0816.2
Inferno7047%0.9614.2
Nuke5549%1.0115.8
Overpass1932%0.9415.7
Train1553%1.5114.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
596msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
30.6%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
9.02HE damage / grenade
7.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4257 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1191% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–4-0.0017%29 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0638%29 Aug
vertigo7–90.0324%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0417%27 Aug
dust210–00.1920%27 Aug
mirage3–13-0.074%27 Aug
ancient0–3-0.020%27 Aug
cache13–90.018%26 Aug
cache13–11-0.0122%24 Aug
dust213–60.0420%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0319%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0213%24 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0531%24 Aug
mirage10–130.0114%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0516%22 Aug
cache13–8-0.0126%22 Aug
dust213–10-0.0311%21 Aug
dust210–130.0023%21 Aug
mirage0–5-0.0933%21 Aug
ancient13–100.0512%20 Aug
nuke8–130.0120%20 Aug
inferno13–40.0316%20 Aug
cache11–13-0.0429%20 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0119%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.0116%19 Aug
anubis13–60.0722%19 Aug
dust26–130.0030%19 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0821%19 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0823%19 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0521%18 Aug
ancient13–30.0122%18 Aug
inferno1–11-0.0714%18 Aug
dust213–50.0523%18 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0218%16 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0227%16 Aug
anubis13–50.0017%16 Aug
nuke9–4-0.0423%15 Aug
inferno9–50.0742%15 Aug
mirage13–20.0734%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0227%14 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0725%12 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0223%12 Aug
inferno9–60.0932%12 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0215%12 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0927%11 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0919%9 Aug
ancient11–130.0515%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0220%8 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0529%6 Aug
anubis3–13-0.059%2 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0026%2 Aug
vertigo13–1-0.026%2 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0122%1 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0332%31 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0318%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0615%28 Jul
dust213–10-0.0228%26 Jul
dust29–130.0017%26 Jul
vertigo1–9-0.137%24 Jul
mirage13–80.049%24 Jul
mirage11–130.0723%21 Jul
nuke4–9-0.0119%29 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0118%28 Jun
dust24–13-0.0537%24 Jun
ancient6–130.0412%24 Jun
anubis13–90.0121%21 Jun
mirage13–80.0437%20 Jun
inferno11–30.0512%20 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0919%19 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0323%18 Jun
ancient13–10.0618%18 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0234%18 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0223%18 Jun
inferno13–50.0029%17 Jun
ancient3–13-0.076%17 Jun
cache13–70.1327%17 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0430%17 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0327%17 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0121%16 Jun
dust23–13-0.0124%16 Jun
overpass13–80.0319%15 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0025%13 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0211%13 Jun
dust213–80.0341%13 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0525%13 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0322%13 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0824%13 Jun
nuke5–9-0.0921%12 Jun
inferno9–30.1414%12 Jun
dust24–13-0.0523%12 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0127%12 Jun
dust213–100.0123%11 Jun
nuke9–50.0526%11 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0024%11 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0718%9 Jun
nuke6–9-0.1422%9 Jun
dust26–13-0.0220%8 Jun
inferno13–50.0822%8 Jun
ancient16–120.0213%7 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0330%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →