Jian Anh Yang — CS2 Stats

76561199091777792[U:1:1131512064]✓ No bans

596Tracked matches32%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJian Anh YangFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning39
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY35596Last 10035%Win rateLWLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression3.7
Utility3.2
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch6.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning3.9
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time651ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 703ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−5.6%
first ⅓ avg 26.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–4
132Biggest win — grail
3Longest win streak
717In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 28nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%-0.01
dust2C2691735%-0.03
infernoB84450%-0.04
anubisD72529%-0.01
nukeD61517%-0.04
cacheD61517%-0.01
ancient4040%-0.01
overpass41325%-0.03
train31233%-0.06
office2020%-0.02
vertigo2020%-0.05
boulder110100%-0.01
alpine1010%-0.04
warden1010%-0.09
grail110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

91Matches
51%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
74.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2157%1.1314.6
Anubis1118%0.7813.2
Inferno956%0.9116.2
Ancient560%0.8916.0
Overpass425%0.518.5
Dust2425%0.7417.3
Vertigo367%0.9213.0
Cache3100%1.0716.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
650msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
29.1%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
6.79HE damage / grenade
6.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4252% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0336%28 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0031%27 Aug
office10–130.0147%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0423%25 Aug
dust213–70.0033%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0624%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0424%16 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0222%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.0416%13 Aug
dust213–9-0.0527%13 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0328%23 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0316%23 Jul
vertigo12–12-0.0518%23 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0419%22 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0420%15 Jul
dust27–13-0.0529%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0121%14 Jul
boulder13–10-0.0117%14 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0312%9 Jul
cache9–130.002%9 Jul
dust212–120.0127%8 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0533%30 Jun
mirage13–11-0.038%25 Jun
dust24–13-0.0338%25 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0219%25 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0518%25 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0519%25 Jun
cache10–130.0218%24 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0410%22 Jun
nuke6–13-0.060%21 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0219%20 Jun
dust213–7-0.0010%20 Jun
overpass12–12-0.0616%20 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0415%20 Jun
cache2–13-0.0514%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0120%19 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0323%19 Jun
cache3–13-0.0419%17 Jun
dust27–13-0.0825%17 Jun
anubis10–130.0818%17 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0211%17 Jun
mirage13–50.0210%17 Jun
mirage10–5-0.0118%17 Jun
dust217–19-0.0118%16 Jun
mirage13–40.1124%16 Jun
dust27–13-0.0518%16 Jun
alpine11–13-0.0420%15 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0020%15 Jun
office4–13-0.0529%15 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0215%14 Jun
mirage13–110.0714%14 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0332%13 Jun
dust213–70.0038%12 Jun
train5–13-0.0433%12 Jun
nuke12–120.0035%11 Jun
dust213–11-0.0444%11 Jun
dust24–13-0.0432%10 Jun
vertigo3–4-0.0550%10 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0225%10 Jun
mirage13–50.0121%10 Jun
mirage9–130.0623%8 Jun
cache9–13-0.0522%8 Jun
train13–7-0.1018%7 Jun
warden4–13-0.0923%7 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0414%7 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0614%6 Jun
ancient6–130.0448%4 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0225%2 Jun
nuke12–12-0.0135%2 Jun
dust211–13-0.0131%2 Jun
dust213–50.0538%2 Jun
dust213–90.0823%1 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0220%31 May
dust210–8-0.0233%30 May
anubis13–100.0443%30 May
overpass13–9-0.0132%30 May
dust211–13-0.0231%23 May
inferno9–13-0.0530%23 May
mirage13–7-0.0227%23 May
dust23–13-0.1137%23 May
mirage13–11-0.0315%10 May
cache13–110.0822%6 May
mirage7–13-0.0417%19 Aug
mirage10–130.0118%15 Jul
mirage13–11-0.077%15 Jul
dust213–7-0.0426%15 Jul
grail13–20.0624%6 Jul
dust25–13-0.0667%19 May
train7–13-0.0343%24 Apr
dust213–6-0.0125%24 Apr
mirage3–20.070%24 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0425%5 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0228%3 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0638%30 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0417%26 Mar
anubis0–3-0.070%26 Mar
dust24–130.0120%26 Mar
mirage1–11-0.0322%6 Mar
ancient1–12-0.0425%4 Mar
dust26–7-0.1340%2 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →