n0tcmac

n0tcmac — CS2 Stats

76561199091571809[U:1:1131306081]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

883Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,235Blue band · top ~53.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21597 of 29793 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 923 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGn0tcmacFACEITLevel 4 · 923 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,235 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning48
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4
Aggression9.1
Utility6.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.8
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time623ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 695ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.32Best rating — inferno 9–4
130Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
38In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 59% over 22nukeWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2213959%0.03
dust2C1881044%-0.01
mirageA1810856%0.01
ancientB158753%0.01
anubisC114736%0.01
cacheD93633%-0.00
nukeD6060%-0.03
overpass110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

299Matches
47%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
80.0ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9240%1.0414.3
Dust24854%1.1313.9
Anubis4445%1.1915.1
Inferno3647%0.9315.0
Ancient2854%1.0515.0
Nuke2752%1.0615.1
Vertigo1953%1.1913.5
Train450%1.0415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
626msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
10.86HE damage / grenade
11.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.3415% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3827% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–20.0514%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0416%25 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0126%18 Aug
dust213–50.1018%17 Aug
cache13–50.0326%16 Aug
anubis12–160.0210%15 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0018%15 Aug
dust24–13-0.0315%15 Aug
ancient13–30.0115%15 Aug
mirage7–130.0113%15 Aug
ancient13–90.0614%14 Aug
dust20–7-0.0718%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0626%11 Aug
cache13–30.0313%11 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0312%11 Aug
inferno13–50.0814%11 Aug
dust216–130.0218%10 Aug
ancient13–50.1020%9 Aug
cache13–40.0820%9 Aug
dust213–70.015%8 Aug
inferno13–30.1411%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.019%8 Aug
inferno11–13-0.025%8 Aug
inferno11–50.1516%8 Aug
ancient9–130.0210%8 Aug
inferno7–13-0.012%8 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0013%8 Aug
mirage9–130.0312%8 Aug
mirage13–40.107%6 Aug
anubis9–130.0421%6 Aug
mirage13–20.0415%6 Aug
mirage13–30.045%6 Aug
ancient13–40.016%6 Aug
anubis7–130.0515%6 Aug
mirage16–130.0511%6 Aug
dust213–60.035%5 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0120%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0518%5 Aug
cache5–13-0.0412%5 Aug
ancient13–40.0216%5 Aug
inferno9–40.3217%5 Aug
ancient8–13-0.009%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0420%4 Aug
anubis13–50.0813%4 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0026%4 Aug
dust211–130.0114%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.0311%4 Aug
inferno9–60.1225%4 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0112%2 Aug
cache11–130.0120%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.0718%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0214%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0714%1 Aug
mirage7–13-0.019%1 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0812%1 Aug
cache6–13-0.0518%1 Aug
anubis13–00.085%1 Aug
inferno13–90.0023%31 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0211%29 Jul
dust215–15-0.0113%28 Jul
dust213–5-0.005%28 Jul
dust214–16-0.0212%28 Jul
inferno13–80.0112%28 Jul
inferno10–13-0.037%4 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0316%27 Feb
nuke5–130.0715%12 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0514%12 Feb
overpass13–5-0.0011%12 Feb
ancient16–130.0410%12 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0513%8 Feb
nuke9–13-0.056%8 Feb
inferno13–70.0615%8 Feb
mirage15–15-0.0512%8 Feb
dust25–13-0.0213%7 Feb
mirage9–13-0.049%7 Feb
dust29–2-0.0113%7 Feb
dust216–14-0.0411%7 Feb
ancient13–100.0313%7 Feb
anubis13–7-0.058%7 Feb
dust29–13-0.0019%5 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0112%5 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0220%31 Jan
ancient9–130.0021%31 Jan
anubis16–130.0715%28 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0212%27 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0226%25 Jan
inferno2–130.0113%25 Jan
dust25–13-0.0818%24 Jan
mirage16–140.0316%23 Jan
anubis6–13-0.058%23 Jan
ancient2–130.0115%23 Jan
inferno16–140.0017%23 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0610%23 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0821%22 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0121%22 Jan
inferno13–10-0.019%22 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0618%19 Jan
inferno9–50.0213%6 Jan
inferno13–80.0112%6 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0212%6 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →