S4ber

S4ber — CS2 Stats

PL76561199090372133[U:1:1130106405]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,183Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,894Purple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10223 of 23306 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,809 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGS4berFACEITLevel 9 · 1,809 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,894 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning58
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56404Last 10056%Win rateLWWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1
Aggression7.7
Utility7.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.8
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time654ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.48Best rating — inferno 9–1
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 47% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA23131057%0.01
infernoB21111052%0.04
ancientB1991047%0.01
nukeA127558%0.01
anubisA95456%0.01
dust2S65183%0.00
cacheA53260%0.04
overpass220100%0.08
office1010%0.07
vertigo1010%-0.15
train110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

882Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
77.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24755%1.0415.6
Ancient20355%0.9715.3
Anubis13748%0.9715.0
Dust210045%0.8914.0
Nuke8952%1.1016.0
Inferno3941%0.8213.9
Train2864%0.8314.8
Overpass1942%0.9415.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
629msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
18.1%Flash assists
9.47HE damage / grenade
9.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7545% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0333%27 Aug
mirage6–00.2132%25 Aug
inferno16–130.0425%20 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0320%20 Aug
ancient16–140.0019%5 Aug
anubis3–9-0.040%31 Jul
dust213–70.0523%31 Jul
mirage2–20.059%31 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0328%31 Jul
anubis7–130.0015%31 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0933%31 Jul
dust213–40.0224%31 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0417%31 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0219%27 Jul
inferno9–40.0721%26 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0645%26 Jul
inferno13–110.0532%25 Jul
cache13–0-0.0516%25 Jul
mirage0–13-0.090%25 Jul
anubis5–130.0131%25 Jul
inferno11–130.0224%24 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0226%24 Jul
ancient13–40.0315%24 Jul
anubis13–100.0538%24 Jul
overpass9–60.1626%24 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0115%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.0434%23 Jul
anubis13–80.0628%23 Jul
inferno13–60.0320%23 Jul
ancient13–100.0028%23 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0914%23 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0438%23 Jul
cache13–20.0524%23 Jul
ancient9–130.0639%23 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0423%22 Jul
cache10–13-0.0219%22 Jul
mirage5–130.0027%22 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0627%20 Jul
inferno9–60.0538%19 Jul
nuke9–70.0123%19 Jul
nuke9–20.0533%19 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1447%19 Jul
inferno9–50.2431%19 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0848%17 Jul
dust213–30.0120%17 Jul
ancient13–160.0120%17 Jul
nuke13–40.0926%17 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0718%16 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0625%14 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0811%14 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0030%14 Jul
mirage13–30.1229%14 Jul
inferno9–10.4850%12 Jul
cache4–100.1328%12 Jul
office3–130.0729%12 Jul
cache13–00.0925%12 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0430%12 Jul
nuke5–30.0022%12 Jul
nuke7–90.0122%10 Jul
vertigo3–9-0.1542%10 Jul
nuke12–120.0313%10 Jul
nuke8–80.0725%3 Jul
ancient13–60.2027%3 Jul
inferno11–130.0432%3 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0419%2 Jul
inferno9–60.1024%2 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0227%2 Jul
mirage13–90.0220%27 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0225%26 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0120%26 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0615%26 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0129%25 Jun
mirage13–110.0320%24 Jun
inferno13–40.0127%24 Jun
anubis13–80.0717%22 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0513%22 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0315%22 Jun
nuke13–80.0321%22 Jun
ancient10–13-0.006%17 Jun
mirage16–130.0520%13 Jun
mirage13–80.0519%11 Jun
ancient8–130.0318%11 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0115%31 May
train13–30.0837%29 May
ancient13–40.0511%29 May
dust213–9-0.0140%24 May
ancient13–80.0416%23 May
mirage13–100.0526%22 May
inferno8–130.1625%21 May
ancient13–110.0926%21 May
ancient8–13-0.0011%20 May
mirage13–40.0511%20 May
dust213–10-0.0020%20 May
inferno13–20.1023%17 May
mirage7–13-0.0318%17 May
overpass13–110.0019%17 May
mirage13–11-0.0120%17 May
anubis16–13-0.0324%6 May
inferno4–13-0.0710%6 May
mirage16–12-0.0320%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →