bel

bel — CS2 Stats

AU76561199090237306[U:1:1129971578]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,394Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating6,982Light Blue band · top ~69.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22906 of 30306 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,322 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbelFACEITLevel 6 · 1,322 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER6,982 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning62
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40573Last 10040%Win rateLWLWTLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression8.6
Utility4.2
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.2
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.07
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time584ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 13–2
132Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
511In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 9mirageWeakest map · 32% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D38132534%0.01
mirageD2581732%0.00
infernoB137654%0.04
nukeB115645%0.01
ancientA95456%0.05
overpass21150%-0.00
anubis110100%-0.04
cache1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
44%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
69.2ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

13%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1164%1.0314.0
Ancient729%0.8812.3
Dust2560%1.0413.2
Overpass425%0.8812.0
Anubis367%0.7414.3
Inferno333%0.7312.0
Nuke30%0.7813.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
588msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
60.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
7.69HE damage / grenade
4.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9714% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0621%26 Aug
inferno13–110.1018%26 Aug
mirage8–130.1217%25 Aug
dust213–30.0418%25 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0417%25 Aug
dust25–130.1020%25 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0117%19 Aug
dust27–130.0926%19 Aug
ancient13–90.049%19 Aug
dust25–13-0.0910%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0124%12 Aug
mirage13–50.0819%12 Aug
dust22–130.0021%12 Aug
inferno12–160.1024%11 Aug
ancient9–10.1517%11 Aug
dust213–100.0716%11 Aug
dust213–100.0429%11 Aug
mirage6–130.0222%11 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0519%8 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0422%8 Aug
dust213–4-0.0327%8 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0334%8 Aug
dust213–110.0327%5 Aug
inferno12–160.0517%5 Aug
nuke5–130.0925%5 Aug
dust214–160.0924%5 Aug
ancient13–100.0815%4 Aug
inferno13–100.0724%4 Aug
mirage9–130.0316%4 Aug
nuke13–80.1122%4 Aug
nuke13–160.0516%29 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0111%29 Jul
nuke10–130.0229%29 Jul
ancient13–50.0610%28 Jul
inferno16–140.0320%28 Jul
dust215–150.0518%28 Jul
inferno13–20.1733%28 Jul
dust29–130.0418%28 Jul
mirage10–130.1022%27 Jul
dust25–130.0015%27 Jul
nuke11–130.0018%27 Jul
dust213–100.0850%27 Jul
dust214–160.0831%27 Jul
mirage9–130.0220%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0127%24 Jul
mirage13–40.0517%24 Jul
inferno16–130.0617%23 Jul
dust211–130.0430%23 Jul
dust213–70.0933%23 Jul
mirage11–130.0632%23 Jul
dust28–130.0231%22 Jul
ancient7–130.0622%22 Jul
ancient6–130.0516%22 Jul
cache3–13-0.0320%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0024%22 Jul
dust213–100.0637%24 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0235%30 May
inferno10–13-0.0331%27 May
dust28–130.0028%27 May
mirage13–9-0.0128%27 May
ancient10–13-0.0122%25 May
dust213–110.0732%25 May
nuke13–9-0.0633%12 May
dust27–13-0.0530%11 May
dust214–160.1022%11 May
mirage13–6-0.0520%11 May
mirage2–130.0820%9 May
dust213–30.0925%9 May
dust213–2-0.0314%9 May
dust20–6-0.1120%7 May
mirage13–9-0.0521%6 May
nuke16–13-0.0210%3 May
mirage10–13-0.0729%3 May
dust24–13-0.0424%1 May
dust26–130.0124%30 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0420%30 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0329%29 Apr
dust213–7-0.0329%29 Apr
dust28–13-0.1010%27 Apr
nuke8–130.0123%27 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0220%27 Apr
dust214–160.0131%27 Apr
dust211–13-0.0425%26 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0431%20 Apr
overpass13–70.0012%20 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0337%20 Apr
dust29–13-0.0831%20 Apr
dust215–15-0.0520%18 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0225%18 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0320%17 Apr
dust23–13-0.0527%17 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0518%8 Apr
dust25–13-0.0517%7 Apr
dust213–20.0631%7 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0321%7 Apr
dust29–13-0.0114%6 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0216%6 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0011%6 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0528%6 Apr
inferno16–13-0.0025%6 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →