birdCOCK81 — CS2 Stats

76561199090163826[U:1:1129898098]

2,688Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning59

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–38–11Last 10051%Win rateTWWLWTWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5

Aggression7.0

Utility6.4

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch6.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.9

Utility6.4

Mechanics8.9

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact5.7

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time605ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms

Headshot accuracy21.5%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — poseidon 9–4

13–0Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	38	19–19	50%	0.00
vertigo	B	19	9–10	47%	0.01
ancient	S	15	10–5	67%	0.04
cache	B	11	5–6	45%	0.02
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	0.00
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.00
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.11
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

180Matches

54%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

69.6ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

10%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	53	47%	0.95	14.8
Vertigo	35	69%	1.13	15.6
Anubis	19	63%	1.11	14.9
Ancient	17	59%	1.10	15.1
Inferno	13	38%	1.03	14.2
Nuke	9	33%	0.92	13.7
Overpass	7	43%	0.96	17.4
Dust2	1	0%	0.68	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy

36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.6%Spray accuracy

90.0%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

604msReaction time

33.1%T opening success

56.8%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

10.4%Flash assists

5.40HE damage / grenade

16.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.0794% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	12–12	-0.07	12%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	18%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	25%	21 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.07	38%	21 Aug →
mirage	4–0	0.17	44%	21 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.01	16%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	15%	21 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.01	19%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	14%	20 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	32%	20 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	21%	19 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.08	18%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	22%	19 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	16%	19 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	24%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–0	0.12	10%	19 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.01	22%	19 Aug →
train	9–13	0.02	37%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	29%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	25%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	20%	18 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.01	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	16%	18 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.04	23%	18 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	17%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	33%	18 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	23%	18 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	17%	18 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	14%	14 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	23%	14 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.06	9%	14 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.03	19%	14 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	14%	13 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	31%	13 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.01	28%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.08	20%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	19%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.02	22%	11 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.02	20%	11 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	20%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.03	17%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	26%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.08	16%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.02	19%	10 Aug →
cache	0–13	-0.05	13%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	16%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	-0.01	26%	4 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	19%	4 Aug →
vertigo	9–1	-0.02	50%	4 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.02	22%	31 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.05	29%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	25%	31 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	29%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.03	22%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.10	26%	29 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.04	19%	29 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	17%	29 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	0.00	15%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.07	22%	28 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	29%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.03	25%	22 Jul →
shelter	2–5	0.11	50%	21 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.03	21%	21 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.05	38%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.08	26%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	24%	21 Jul →
vertigo	9–4	-0.01	32%	20 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	0.20	33%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.06	38%	20 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.05	17%	20 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.01	20%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	19%	16 Jul →
vertigo	5–13	-0.04	22%	16 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	24%	16 Jul →
vertigo	6–13	-0.07	10%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.10	14%	12 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	14%	12 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	14%	2 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.06	21%	2 Jul →
vertigo	4–13	0.02	17%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.01	28%	26 Jun →
train	13–7	-0.02	21%	22 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.02	22%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.02	16%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.02	24%	19 Jun →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	14%	18 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	24%	18 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.01	21%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.05	20%	10 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	16%	10 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	26%	10 Jun →
vertigo	4–13	-0.01	29%	10 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.10	18%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	17%	2 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.04	22%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	22%	1 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.07	22%	1 Jun →