kjkszpj132 — CS2 Stats

76561199086016646[U:1:1125750918]✓ No bans

3,199Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.1 Developing

Premier CS Rating15,603Purple band · top ~26% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,894 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32

Positioning54

Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateWLLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.2

Aggression6.1

Utility6.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 63% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2

Positioning5.4

Utility6.9

Mechanics2.9

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time575ms−81ms

first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy12.2%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–2Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 27cacheWeakest map · 40% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	27	15–12	56%	-0.02
mirage	C	24	10–14	42%	-0.00
ancient	B	17	9–8	53%	-0.03
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.05
cache	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.03
dust2	C	10	4–6	40%	0.00
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,138Matches

50%Win rate

0.93Avg K/D

75.0ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	377	54%	0.99	14.6
Ancient	361	53%	0.93	14.6
Mirage	348	45%	0.92	14.0
Nuke	140	51%	0.88	14.0
Dust2	139	50%	0.94	14.0
Anubis	131	47%	0.92	14.4
Vertigo	104	62%	0.93	15.1
Train	39	36%	0.79	12.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.0%Headshot accuracy

28.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.2%Spray accuracy

62.8%Counter-strafing

11.4°Preaim

580msReaction time

28.9%T opening success

47.3%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

7.0%Flash assists

9.15HE damage / grenade

12.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.9696% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.9381% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–2	-0.00	5%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	11%	18 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	16%	18 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.06	16%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.08	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	20%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.06	16%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	7%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–19	-0.03	13%	11 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.09	7%	11 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.01	15%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.04	12%	11 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	6%	10 Aug →
inferno	22–20	-0.03	8%	7 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	23%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	10%	7 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.08	10%	6 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.01	14%	6 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.00	9%	6 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	10%	6 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.01	12%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	18%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	12%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.02	18%	2 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	11%	2 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.00	6%	2 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	10%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	15%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	10%	26 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	8%	26 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.04	13%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	11%	25 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.05	15%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	6%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	10%	23 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	7%	22 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	9%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	11%	22 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	16%	22 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	15%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	5%	21 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	12%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	2%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	19%	20 Jul →
inferno	16–12	-0.03	16%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	13%	19 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	4%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.03	14%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.10	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	5%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	8%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.03	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	11%	14 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	14%	11 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	14%	3 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	10%	3 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	20%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.03	20%	28 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	24%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	5%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	14%	24 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	11%	23 Jun →
inferno	12–16	-0.05	11%	23 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.11	15%	23 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.02	24%	23 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	8%	18 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.01	11%	16 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	7%	16 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	13%	16 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	12%	16 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	10%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	15%	7 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	9%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.10	15%	3 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.08	23%	29 May →
inferno	13–10	0.06	16%	28 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	15%	27 May →
nuke	1–13	-0.06	11%	26 May →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	10%	26 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	6%	26 May →
mirage	15–15	0.00	10%	21 May →
inferno	13–3	-0.01	16%	21 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	11%	20 May →
mirage	13–7	0.06	12%	19 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	17%	18 May →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	10%	17 May →
dust2	12–16	-0.02	5%	16 May →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	11%	15 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	17%	15 May →
overpass	13–11	-0.04	17%	15 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	17%	12 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.09	7%	10 May →
cache	4–13	-0.09	8%	10 May →
inferno	13–5	0.04	18%	10 May →
ancient	13–4	0.04	21%	10 May →
nuke	13–4	-0.04	7%	10 May →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	10%	9 May →