W0lfG4nG Le4dEr

W0lfG4nG Le4dEr — CS2 Stats

FI76561199084645034[U:1:1124379306]Steam profile ↗

2,528Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,066 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGW0lfG4nG Le4dErFACEITLevel 9 · 2,066 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning52
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY3961Last 10039%Win rateLWLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression7.4
Utility4.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.2
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time627ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 30.7% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–9
132Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
714In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5cacheWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB24121250%0.01
ancientD2261627%-0.02
mirageC167944%-0.01
infernoD124833%-0.02
anubisD103730%-0.02
cacheD82625%-0.03
dust2A53260%0.03
overpass32167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,726Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
79.7ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage56750%1.0416.6
Ancient52451%1.0016.2
Nuke42155%1.0316.3
Anubis20056%1.0717.0
Train15249%1.0115.7
Dust215140%0.9315.1
Inferno12743%0.9215.5
Overpass10450%0.9515.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
89.1%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
611msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
4.44HE damage / grenade
6.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1133% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0423%28 Aug
nuke13–100.0427%28 Aug
ancient7–130.0520%27 Aug
cache6–13-0.0428%27 Aug
cache12–16-0.0024%26 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0019%25 Aug
dust213–100.0343%24 Aug
cache13–4-0.0126%23 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0423%22 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0117%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0317%7 Aug
mirage19–170.0425%7 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0120%7 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0314%6 Aug
nuke13–110.0823%5 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0122%5 Aug
nuke13–100.0734%4 Aug
cache2–13-0.0714%4 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0324%3 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0550%3 Aug
cache7–13-0.0422%1 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0423%28 Jul
nuke13–40.0531%25 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0034%25 Jul
nuke12–160.0224%21 Jul
ancient16–120.0332%13 Jul
nuke11–130.0126%11 Jul
anubis17–19-0.048%10 Jul
anubis13–60.0243%10 Jul
nuke13–110.0326%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0530%4 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0713%4 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0519%3 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0324%1 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0529%1 Jul
anubis13–100.0816%30 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0327%30 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0536%30 Jun
mirage13–90.0126%29 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0719%29 Jun
dust210–13-0.0231%29 Jun
dust213–90.0924%28 Jun
dust26–130.0232%28 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0233%28 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0421%27 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0929%23 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0424%23 Jun
mirage13–80.0435%23 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0546%23 Jun
cache16–12-0.0132%23 Jun
nuke13–100.0016%22 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0126%21 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0426%21 Jun
ancient13–90.0021%21 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0518%18 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0235%18 Jun
ancient17–19-0.0034%17 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0424%16 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0329%15 Jun
inferno13–50.0241%15 Jun
nuke13–60.0431%5 Jun
ancient4–5-0.0538%30 May
mirage11–13-0.0231%29 May
mirage8–13-0.0310%25 May
mirage13–7-0.0735%25 May
nuke5–13-0.0436%19 May
ancient8–13-0.0635%17 May
nuke13–90.0218%17 May
mirage14–16-0.0133%16 May
ancient9–13-0.0330%15 May
anubis5–13-0.0742%15 May
nuke10–130.0420%9 May
cache4–13-0.0717%8 May
anubis13–16-0.0230%3 May
nuke9–130.0039%30 Apr
cache9–13-0.0140%30 Apr
nuke13–100.0630%29 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0416%29 Apr
overpass9–130.0043%24 Apr
anubis5–13-0.1041%24 Apr
ancient10–130.0448%21 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0423%20 Apr
dust213–100.0129%12 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0532%9 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0541%9 Apr
anubis13–16-0.0122%6 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0736%5 Apr
inferno13–30.0843%22 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0429%21 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0223%16 Mar
mirage11–130.0027%16 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0126%13 Feb
mirage13–20.0622%13 Feb
ancient13–80.0545%25 Jan
overpass13–70.0421%23 Jan
inferno2–13-0.0238%22 Jan
mirage13–110.0221%19 Jan
ancient16–19-0.0038%19 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0327%19 Jan
ancient22–19-0.0321%18 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →