FalleN_l1fe

FalleN_l1fe — CS2 Stats

CA76561199076226976[U:1:1115961248]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,520Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFalleN_l1feFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning61
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43525Last 10043%Win rateWWLLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression8.7
Utility4.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.1
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time636ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy27.6%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 27.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–4
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 32% over 31
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD31102132%-0.01
dust2C25101540%-0.01
infernoC25111444%0.01
ancientS1712571%0.00
anubis1010%-0.04
nuke1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

500Matches
56%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
93.2ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7352%1.2520.1
Inferno6665%1.3218.6
Anubis6065%1.3418.9
Ancient2250%1.2319.3
Dust21145%1.2320.7
Vertigo1050%1.1516.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.1%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
630msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
55.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
8.97HE damage / grenade
7.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.0689% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0119%25 Aug
inferno13–30.1622%25 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0210%25 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0422%18 Aug
dust28–13-0.0213%11 Jul
dust213–3-0.0033%10 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0013%10 Jul
inferno10–130.0424%8 Jul
dust210–130.0120%8 Jul
mirage6–130.0124%8 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0316%8 Jul
dust213–11-0.0520%8 Jul
dust213–110.0829%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0215%5 Jul
inferno4–130.0131%13 Jun
dust22–13-0.0728%13 Jun
ancient13–90.0037%12 Jun
inferno13–10.0731%12 Jun
mirage13–70.0928%12 Jun
dust213–10-0.0437%10 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0331%10 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0471%10 Jun
dust216–13-0.0424%7 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0817%7 Jun
inferno8–130.0017%7 Jun
dust23–13-0.1050%5 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0350%5 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0646%4 Jun
dust23–13-0.0242%4 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0327%4 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0028%4 Jun
mirage13–60.0417%3 Jun
ancient13–40.0520%3 Jun
inferno13–90.0218%3 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0416%2 Jun
mirage0–13-0.1050%2 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0224%2 Jun
mirage9–130.0225%1 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0529%1 Jun
dust213–9-0.0126%1 Jun
dust24–13-0.0442%1 Jun
dust215–15-0.0529%31 May
mirage8–13-0.0334%31 May
mirage7–13-0.0526%31 May
ancient13–50.0129%31 May
inferno16–120.0315%31 May
ancient13–80.0121%30 May
inferno4–13-0.0350%30 May
inferno10–130.0033%29 May
dust213–100.0031%29 May
mirage13–80.0936%26 May
mirage9–13-0.0728%26 May
mirage11–130.0253%24 May
inferno4–0-0.01100%24 May
mirage9–13-0.0527%24 May
mirage15–15-0.0733%24 May
inferno7–13-0.0322%22 May
mirage7–13-0.0342%20 May
ancient13–90.0027%20 May
ancient10–130.0025%20 May
inferno16–14-0.0136%19 May
dust210–13-0.0022%19 May
ancient13–6-0.0313%19 May
mirage9–13-0.0724%19 May
mirage5–13-0.0239%18 May
inferno11–13-0.0223%18 May
dust213–80.0628%18 May
mirage16–13-0.0131%15 May
mirage11–13-0.0542%15 May
mirage13–40.1823%14 May
dust24–13-0.0217%14 May
mirage6–130.0122%14 May
dust23–13-0.0530%11 May
ancient8–130.0223%11 May
ancient13–110.0716%11 May
dust25–130.0427%9 May
inferno16–140.0733%9 May
dust213–160.0120%8 May
mirage15–15-0.0225%8 May
dust23–13-0.0535%7 May
inferno5–13-0.0717%7 May
mirage11–130.0223%7 May
inferno13–11-0.0222%6 May
inferno11–13-0.0129%2 May
ancient9–13-0.0519%1 May
dust215–15-0.0226%1 May
ancient13–5-0.0713%29 Apr
mirage13–20.0534%29 Apr
ancient13–40.0724%29 Apr
ancient8–13-0.058%23 Apr
ancient13–10.0941%23 Apr
inferno13–50.0550%23 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0414%23 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0223%22 Apr
mirage13–30.0037%21 Apr
nuke11–130.0248%21 Apr
mirage12–6-0.0042%21 Apr
inferno13–40.0718%20 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0120%20 Apr
dust213–50.1025%19 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →