Craigg

Craigg — CS2 Stats

76561199061753584[U:1:1101487856]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

435Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,590Purple band · top ~26.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31256 of 53837 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCraiggPREMIER15,590 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning56
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48493Last 10048%Win rateLLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression6.2
Utility5.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time647ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy26.9%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 26.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — debris 9–6
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1871139%-0.01
mirageC167944%0.01
ancientB157847%0.02
cacheA148657%0.02
infernoD134931%-0.01
anubisS129375%0.01
nukeB105550%0.01
boulder1010%0.03
debris110100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
40%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
88.9ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage367%1.6226.7
Cache20%0.9218.5
Inferno10%0.539.0
Dust21100%1.2018.0
Ancient1100%1.6016.0
Anubis10%0.5610.0
Nuke10%0.9518.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.5%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
659msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
57.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
7.60HE damage / grenade
14.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7965% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–13-0.0630%31 Aug
dust210–13-0.0231%30 Aug
anubis13–20.0246%30 Aug
dust27–13-0.0225%29 Aug
cache13–90.0336%29 Aug
dust210–13-0.0237%27 Aug
cache7–130.0129%27 Aug
dust213–7-0.0633%27 Aug
ancient10–130.0821%27 Aug
nuke7–130.0623%26 Aug
dust213–100.0728%26 Aug
ancient9–40.0121%26 Aug
mirage7–130.0220%26 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0237%26 Aug
cache10–13-0.0833%26 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0042%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0124%23 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0132%23 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0128%22 Aug
dust23–13-0.0414%22 Aug
mirage13–80.0119%22 Aug
ancient15–150.1018%22 Aug
nuke13–100.0627%21 Aug
dust213–80.0828%21 Aug
inferno8–130.0229%21 Aug
dust216–13-0.0625%21 Aug
ancient13–30.0531%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0222%20 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0218%20 Aug
inferno10–130.0124%20 Aug
mirage8–130.0533%19 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0313%18 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0112%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0137%18 Aug
ancient8–130.0017%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0125%17 Aug
cache11–130.0333%17 Aug
dust29–13-0.0124%17 Aug
anubis13–90.0824%17 Aug
inferno9–70.0828%17 Aug
nuke11–130.0128%17 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0619%16 Aug
anubis13–7-0.057%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0718%16 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0613%16 Aug
anubis13–80.0316%16 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0720%16 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0313%15 Aug
ancient13–20.0424%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0426%15 Aug
anubis13–90.0620%15 Aug
cache13–6-0.0232%15 Aug
cache13–11-0.0315%15 Aug
mirage13–110.0212%15 Aug
anubis13–110.0625%15 Aug
dust213–40.0123%15 Aug
dust20–13-0.108%15 Aug
nuke13–90.0521%14 Aug
mirage9–130.0723%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0626%13 Aug
ancient11–130.0223%13 Aug
cache13–20.1037%13 Aug
ancient3–130.0132%13 Aug
mirage9–130.0123%13 Aug
dust211–130.0120%13 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0329%13 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0416%12 Aug
inferno5–130.0111%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0129%12 Aug
cache4–13-0.0117%12 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0621%12 Aug
anubis15–150.0520%11 Aug
cache13–100.0924%11 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0022%11 Aug
ancient13–110.0128%10 Aug
mirage13–90.0615%10 Aug
cache8–130.0726%10 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0126%8 Aug
ancient9–130.0023%8 Aug
nuke6–130.0317%7 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0335%7 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0815%6 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0031%5 Aug
boulder7–130.0331%5 Aug
cache13–70.0929%4 Aug
ancient13–110.0218%4 Aug
mirage13–90.0824%4 Aug
cache13–00.0150%4 Aug
dust213–110.0627%4 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0227%4 Aug
cache13–90.0023%4 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0112%3 Aug
debris9–60.1348%3 Aug
inferno15–150.0036%3 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0519%3 Aug
ancient13–70.0816%3 Aug
nuke13–60.0221%3 Aug
mirage13–40.0323%31 Jul
cache11–130.0427%31 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0113%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →