Holyman — CS2 Stats

76561199053640331[U:1:1093374603]Steam profile ↗

574Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 6 · 745 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70

Positioning50

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateWWLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0

Aggression6.7

Utility5.8

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch6.2

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0

Positioning5.0

Utility5.8

Mechanics8.6

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time642ms−22ms

first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms

Headshot accuracy12.7%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — cache 13–3

13–0Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8cacheWeakest map · 33% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	25	11–14	44%	0.02
cache	D	18	6–12	33%	0.05
mirage	C	16	6–10	38%	0.00
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.01
inferno	A	8	5–3	63%	0.04
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	0.02
train	—	2	2–0	100%	0.06
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.07
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches

67%Win rate

1.40Avg K/D

90.3ADR

32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	14	57%	1.32	18.3
Mirage	10	70%	1.56	18.3
Nuke	7	57%	1.11	16.1
Anubis	4	100%	1.86	23.0
Inferno	3	67%	1.24	17.0
Ancient	2	50%	0.94	13.5
Overpass	1	100%	1.06	19.0
Cache	1	100%	2.67	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy

39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.4%Spray accuracy

88.6%Counter-strafing

11.3°Preaim

646msReaction time

29.3%T opening success

45.0%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

7.6%Flash assists

10.16HE damage / grenade

9.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.9219% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4457 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.3406% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–8	0.03	12%	28 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.17	10%	28 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	5%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.00	11%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.07	16%	26 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	5%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.04	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.15	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	19%	24 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.03	8%	24 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	9%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.05	16%	23 Aug →
inferno	6–1	0.01	13%	23 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.12	11%	21 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	14%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	8%	21 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.02	13%	21 Aug →
anubis	5–2	0.06	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	11%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	20%	14 Aug →
train	13–11	0.05	14%	13 Aug →
train	13–6	0.08	18%	13 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.06	12%	11 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	17%	11 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.02	22%	11 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	7%	17 May →
cache	11–13	0.01	12%	17 May →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	9%	17 May →
cache	13–8	0.07	22%	17 May →
cache	3–13	0.04	7%	17 May →
cache	6–13	-0.01	16%	17 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.08	10%	14 May →
inferno	12–12	0.05	16%	14 May →
dust2	13–0	-0.01	16%	14 May →
cache	4–13	0.02	3%	14 May →
cache	13–6	0.07	7%	14 May →
inferno	9–13	0.06	16%	14 May →
office	7–13	-0.01	20%	14 May →
office	13–7	0.08	10%	14 May →
nuke	19–17	-0.00	9%	11 May →
overpass	8–13	-0.05	9%	11 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	16%	11 May →
mirage	13–7	0.00	30%	11 May →
overpass	13–4	0.19	25%	11 May →
cache	9–13	-0.01	13%	11 May →
cache	12–12	0.07	11%	10 May →
dust2	2–13	0.00	17%	10 May →
cache	13–3	0.23	8%	8 May →
dust2	16–13	0.05	19%	8 May →
cache	10–13	-0.03	5%	8 May →
anubis	13–10	0.00	14%	8 May →
mirage	13–6	0.04	20%	8 May →
cache	13–7	0.02	11%	6 May →
cache	13–8	0.04	10%	6 May →
cache	4–10	0.04	12%	6 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	11%	5 May →
dust2	13–7	0.05	10%	5 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	6%	5 May →
dust2	13–5	0.16	12%	3 May →
mirage	12–12	0.02	16%	3 May →
ancient	9–13	0.00	15%	3 May →
dust2	13–6	0.07	18%	3 May →
nuke	13–8	0.03	14%	3 May →
ancient	13–11	0.05	18%	3 May →
mirage	10–13	0.00	12%	3 May →
dust2	8–13	0.00	16%	3 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	10%	3 May →
nuke	13–2	0.00	13%	3 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	24%	3 May →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	22%	30 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.02	18%	30 Apr →
cache	11–13	-0.03	9%	30 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	8%	30 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.07	9%	29 Apr →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	3%	28 Apr →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	20%	28 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.00	4%	28 Apr →
anubis	13–6	-0.03	6%	23 Apr →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	4%	23 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	8%	23 Apr →
inferno	7–13	0.01	9%	23 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.05	16%	21 Apr →
nuke	13–3	0.04	19%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	9%	21 Apr →
anubis	13–4	-0.04	5%	21 Apr →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	8%	20 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.01	11%	20 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	8%	20 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	13%	18 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	9%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.07	10%	18 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	11%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	5%	16 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.07	14%	16 Apr →
inferno	13–5	0.07	22%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.06	18%	13 Apr →
vertigo	5–13	-0.04	13%	13 Apr →
dust2	13–6	0.07	14%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–3	0.11	21%	12 Apr →