rAt

rAt — CS2 Stats

CH76561199043776305[U:1:1083510577]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

815Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,432 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrAtFACEITLevel 7 · 1,432 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning52
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateWLLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression7.0
Utility4.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 667ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.2
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time677ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 677ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — nuke 9–0
130Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 61% over 23nukeWeakest map · 48% over 31
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB31151648%0.01
cacheA2314961%0.01
mirageA2011955%0.02
dust2A74357%0.05
ancient42250%0.08
inferno31233%0.01
anubis21150%-0.07
vertigo21150%0.02
overpass2020%-0.06
office1010%-0.09
fachwerk110100%-0.01
shelter110100%0.04
italy1010%-0.01
warden110100%0.02
train110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

243Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
79.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7651%1.0616.4
Dust25050%0.9614.9
Anubis3155%0.9416.4
Nuke2665%1.2718.7
Inferno2361%0.9015.1
Ancient2143%0.9015.1
Vertigo729%0.7011.4
Overpass540%0.7615.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
667msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
5.52HE damage / grenade
8.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.557% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.0114%31 Jul
office1–13-0.0919%31 Jul
mirage0–8-0.0515%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0411%19 Jul
nuke1–9-0.2413%19 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0415%18 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0726%15 Jul
cache13–3-0.0413%11 Jul
ancient13–70.1212%11 Jul
nuke11–130.0116%11 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0711%11 Jul
fachwerk13–5-0.0118%9 Jul
shelter13–30.0413%8 Jul
cache1–13-0.0413%8 Jul
cache13–30.0411%8 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0519%8 Jul
vertigo13–30.0915%7 Jul
cache13–3-0.013%7 Jul
dust26–130.0224%6 Jul
dust213–40.0412%6 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0021%6 Jul
italy8–13-0.0112%5 Jul
cache13–110.0714%5 Jul
ancient6–10.1426%4 Jul
cache10–30.0219%4 Jul
warden13–50.0218%3 Jul
cache7–13-0.0222%3 Jul
cache13–80.0420%1 Jul
mirage13–110.1023%1 Jul
cache9–13-0.1125%30 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0123%30 Jun
mirage12–120.0219%30 Jun
cache4–13-0.0731%29 Jun
ancient10–130.0641%29 Jun
vertigo5–13-0.0621%28 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0622%25 Jun
mirage11–13-0.040%23 Jun
nuke12–160.0427%23 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0415%18 Jun
mirage12–120.1121%2 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0214%1 Jun
mirage13–30.0719%24 May
train13–11-0.0229%24 May
cache13–80.0123%23 May
mirage4–13-0.0119%22 May
cache7–130.0020%22 May
nuke2–9-0.0622%22 May
nuke9–50.1518%15 May
cache9–13-0.0018%15 May
nuke3–9-0.1413%15 May
nuke5–9-0.0125%15 May
dust213–10.1438%14 May
inferno13–50.0034%14 May
cache13–70.0512%10 May
cache9–130.0516%9 May
nuke2–13-0.0310%9 May
cache13–90.0118%9 May
cache13–40.0612%9 May
cache7–130.0221%9 May
cache13–9-0.056%7 May
cache13–80.0411%3 May
cache12–120.0429%1 May
cache13–60.0815%30 Apr
mirage13–110.0117%27 Apr
nuke6–90.0820%27 Apr
nuke9–70.0221%26 Apr
nuke9–60.0733%26 Apr
nuke9–70.0415%26 Apr
nuke4–9-0.1115%26 Apr
nuke9–60.018%26 Apr
dust210–13-0.0211%26 Apr
nuke9–50.0828%25 Apr
ancient7–130.0124%25 Apr
inferno2–130.0424%25 Apr
dust213–60.0724%24 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0229%24 Apr
dust26–13-0.0211%24 Apr
nuke5–9-0.0229%24 Apr
dust213–90.0813%24 Apr
nuke13–80.0123%23 Apr
mirage13–70.0016%23 Apr
nuke9–00.2620%22 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0328%22 Apr
nuke9–40.0020%20 Apr
nuke9–50.038%19 Apr
mirage13–60.1522%5 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0615%4 Apr
nuke5–9-0.3314%4 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0529%4 Apr
nuke9–50.0921%4 Apr
nuke9–40.0521%4 Apr
nuke9–30.1246%3 Apr
mirage6–13-0.039%3 Apr
nuke7–9-0.118%3 Apr
nuke7–20.0813%3 Apr
nuke8–8-0.018%2 Apr
nuke7–90.2018%2 Apr
nuke9–50.0621%1 Apr
mirage13–110.082%1 Apr
mirage13–00.2345%1 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →