bidward — CS2 Stats

76561199040240389[U:1:1079974661]Steam profile ↗

2,022Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,416 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning41

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–46–11Last 10043%Win rateLLLLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression3.1

Utility4.1

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning4.1

Utility4.1

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels0.1

Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time647ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms

Headshot accuracy18.6%−0.1%

first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–5

13–1Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

L4Current streak

5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 16% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	26	14–12	54%	0.01
mirage	D	19	3–16	16%	0.01
dust2	B	13	7–6	54%	0.04
ancient	D	11	3–8	27%	0.02
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	0.02
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	0.01
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	0.05
eldorado	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
debris	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.04
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (16% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

213Matches

52%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

81.4ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	62	45%	1.02	14.5
Dust2	42	45%	1.01	15.1
Ancient	28	75%	1.17	16.8
Nuke	28	39%	1.11	16.0
Inferno	27	63%	1.21	15.7
Train	10	70%	1.27	17.9
Anubis	8	38%	0.84	10.8
Overpass	7	57%	1.26	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.5%Spray accuracy

82.5%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

635msReaction time

25.5%T opening success

31.0%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

7.0%Flash assists

8.60HE damage / grenade

5.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.5096% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

16% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	1–13	-0.11	15%	27 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	6%	27 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	27%	26 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.08	15%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	15%	25 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	22%	25 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.03	33%	25 Jul →
eldorado	9–4	0.07	13%	9 Jul →
debris	3–9	-0.07	17%	9 Jul →
eldorado	2–9	-0.14	4%	8 Jul →
debris	8–8	-0.02	16%	8 Jul →
train	13–4	0.03	27%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.09	26%	2 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.04	14%	2 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	20%	2 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	16%	1 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.09	24%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–1	0.08	18%	24 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	16%	24 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.02	20%	22 Jun →
inferno	6–9	-0.01	16%	22 Jun →
inferno	6–9	0.08	20%	22 Jun →
nuke	9–4	0.15	23%	22 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	9%	19 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	33%	19 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	18%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	9%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.03	19%	29 May →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	26%	27 May →
mirage	12–12	0.08	19%	18 May →
mirage	5–13	0.02	21%	17 May →
cache	3–13	0.01	24%	17 May →
ancient	10–13	0.04	10%	12 May →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	14%	12 May →
cache	13–6	0.05	19%	8 May →
cache	13–7	0.09	35%	7 May →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	12%	7 May →
dust2	12–12	0.10	26%	7 May →
cache	12–12	-0.02	20%	7 May →
cache	8–13	0.06	26%	5 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	9%	5 May →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	18%	4 May →
cache	13–8	0.06	18%	4 May →
cache	13–6	-0.00	23%	4 May →
cache	11–13	0.06	30%	2 May →
cache	12–12	-0.05	17%	2 May →
cache	13–10	0.00	28%	1 May →
cache	6–13	-0.01	12%	30 Apr →
cache	13–4	0.00	28%	30 Apr →
ancient	13–4	0.01	14%	30 Apr →
vertigo	6–9	0.02	19%	30 Apr →
cache	13–8	-0.01	14%	30 Apr →
cache	11–13	0.03	30%	30 Apr →
cache	13–1	0.11	22%	29 Apr →
cache	6–13	-0.01	29%	29 Apr →
cache	4–13	-0.04	13%	29 Apr →
cache	13–6	0.09	19%	29 Apr →
cache	13–11	-0.05	21%	29 Apr →
cache	13–5	-0.02	22%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.03	25%	29 Apr →
inferno	13–7	0.02	17%	28 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.01	13%	28 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	12%	28 Apr →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	10%	26 Apr →
vertigo	13–11	0.07	22%	25 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.08	27%	25 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.04	14%	25 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.02	14%	25 Apr →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	23%	25 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	20%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	21%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.02	18%	24 Apr →
mirage	12–12	0.04	14%	23 Apr →
nuke	12–12	0.03	25%	23 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	27%	22 Apr →
anubis	13–4	0.04	21%	22 Apr →
mirage	12–12	0.01	15%	22 Apr →
anubis	9–13	0.11	19%	21 Apr →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	19%	21 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	24%	21 Apr →
nuke	13–3	0.07	13%	21 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	11%	21 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.06	20%	20 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.18	18%	20 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.06	28%	20 Apr →
dust2	12–12	0.00	11%	19 Apr →
dust2	12–12	0.03	14%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.07	19%	17 Apr →
anubis	8–13	0.05	11%	17 Apr →
inferno	8–13	0.03	15%	17 Apr →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	29%	17 Apr →
mirage	12–12	0.17	17%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	17%	17 Apr →
dust2	13–2	0.11	23%	17 Apr →
ancient	4–9	0.04	13%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.08	20%	16 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	19%	16 Apr →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	24%	16 Apr →
anubis	13–6	0.12	12%	16 Apr →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	24%	16 Apr →