Cornelius Niggleton — CS2 Stats

76561199032097610[U:1:1071831882]

155Tracked matches86%Win rate2026Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating26,659Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1302 of 20186 tracked

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim99

Positioning84

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT69–29–2Last 10069%Win rateWWWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.9

Aggression10.0

Utility3.1

Positioning8.4

Opening Duels8.7

Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like m0NESY 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 99 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 48% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.9

Positioning8.4

Utility3.1

Mechanics0.0

Opening Duels8.7

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.13+0.10

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.13

Reaction time373ms−196ms

first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 373ms

Headshot accuracy32.1%+12.4%

first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 32.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — anubis 13–3

13–0Biggest win — mirage

10Longest win streak

W10Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 89% over 9ancientWeakest map · 50% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	22	17–5	77%	0.02
nuke	S	21	15–6	71%	0.05
inferno	A	20	11–9	55%	0.06
cache	S	11	8–3	73%	0.08
anubis	S	9	8–1	89%	0.09
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	0.02
debris	—	4	3–1	75%	0.09
dust2	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.10
poseidon	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches

0%Win rate

0.53Avg K/D

44.4ADR

11%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.4%Headshot accuracy

50.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

52.0%Spray accuracy

48.0%Counter-strafing

4.6°Preaim

351msReaction time

65.6%T opening success

63.6%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

8.3%Flash assists

10.53HE damage / grenade

4.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4762 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–6	0.25	52%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–4	0.06	65%	1 Aug →
vertigo	9–3	0.16	21%	1 Aug →
inferno	9–4	0.26	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.17	27%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.07	13%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.23	22%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.23	45%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.08	22%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.16	45%	29 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.19	39%	29 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.23	20%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.08	17%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.00	0%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.19	27%	28 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.05	57%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.16	27%	28 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.02	41%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.25	43%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.03	55%	28 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.03	62%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.08	64%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.15	45%	28 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.13	55%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.14	33%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.24	25%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.31	15%	28 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.21	48%	27 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.25	19%	27 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	11%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	0%	27 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	0%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	23%	27 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.09	21%	27 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.13	19%	27 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	8%	27 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	18%	27 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.07	33%	27 Jul →
nuke	9–6	0.04	8%	27 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.08	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	9–3	0.06	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	31%	26 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	17%	26 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.07	32%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.02	12%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.06	14%	26 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	14%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	9%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	13%	23 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	8%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	24%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.02	8%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	35%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.10	38%	22 Jul →
cache	0–7	-0.04	0%	22 Jul →
poseidon	7–9	-0.05	26%	20 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	23%	20 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.08	50%	20 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	40%	20 Jul →
inferno	6–9	0.07	27%	19 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–3	-0.07	11%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–2	-0.02	18%	19 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.05	11%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.15	27%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	26%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	9%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	12%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	13%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.01	11%	18 Jul →
debris	9–7	0.06	23%	16 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.07	19%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.02	17%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	22%	15 Jul →
inferno	16–12	0.01	36%	15 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	12%	15 Jul →
anubis	12–8	0.01	11%	15 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	9%	15 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	38%	14 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	15%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.06	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	36%	14 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.06	17%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.06	15%	14 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.09	20%	13 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.03	21%	13 Jul →
nuke	9–7	-0.01	11%	13 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	5%	13 Jul →
nuke	9–2	0.14	5%	13 Jul →
inferno	9–1	0.26	50%	13 Jul →
vertigo	9–5	0.04	16%	13 Jul →
debris	9–3	0.07	9%	13 Jul →
nuke	6–9	-0.03	21%	13 Jul →
inferno	7–9	0.02	22%	13 Jul →
debris	9–3	0.13	21%	13 Jul →
inferno	9–7	0.03	35%	13 Jul →
poseidon	9–5	0.03	24%	12 Jul →