cyblorg — CS2 Stats

76561199031150800[U:1:1070885072]

172Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,633Blue band · top ~40.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26405 of 39017 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcyblorgPREMIER12,633 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning51
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51445Last 10051%Win rateWTWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression6.9
Utility3.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 770ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.1
Utility3.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time762ms+57ms
first ⅓ avg 705ms → last ⅓ avg 762ms
Headshot accuracy31.7%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 27.8% → last ⅓ avg 31.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — cache 4–5
131Biggest win — mirage
11Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 44% over 41
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC41182344%-0.01
dust2A2213959%0.01
nukeB147750%-0.01
vertigoS54180%0.01
infernoA53260%0.05
cache31233%0.08
train3030%-0.03
ancient32167%-0.04
anubis21150%-0.04
overpass220100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 41). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
33%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
64.4ADR
68%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage250%0.7414.0
Nuke10%0.5413.0
Ancient1100%1.1622.0
Inferno10%0.477.0
Dust210%0.6511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.6%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
770msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
4.96HE damage / grenade
4.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 770.3007ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9792% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 41 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–8-0.0142%15 Jul
mirage12–120.0528%11 Jul
vertigo13–20.0640%7 Jul
cache13–11-0.0037%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0528%4 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0336%23 Jun
mirage13–90.0121%13 Jun
mirage3–10-0.0738%10 Jun
dust29–130.0122%9 Jun
cache8–100.0531%9 Jun
mirage4–13-0.106%6 Jun
mirage13–30.0425%6 Jun
mirage11–130.0515%3 Jun
inferno7–9-0.0926%3 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0539%23 May
dust213–50.0234%23 May
mirage5–13-0.0825%23 May
mirage13–5-0.0326%23 May
cache4–50.2044%20 May
mirage6–13-0.0226%3 May
nuke11–130.0136%3 May
nuke5–120.0039%27 Apr
dust24–13-0.0335%27 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0962%26 Apr
train4–13-0.0718%26 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0137%24 Apr
dust213–9-0.0238%20 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0334%19 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0343%19 Apr
train3–11-0.0135%19 Apr
nuke13–50.0130%15 Apr
mirage10–130.0024%15 Apr
nuke7–6-0.0224%15 Apr
nuke13–70.0016%14 Apr
mirage13–50.0128%14 Apr
dust20–13-0.0160%14 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0141%10 Apr
dust213–40.1333%10 Apr
dust23–7-0.1236%10 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0534%10 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0635%10 Apr
dust213–5-0.0030%10 Apr
dust213–100.0042%3 Apr
dust213–40.0652%1 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0113%1 Apr
inferno13–80.0924%1 Apr
inferno13–40.0560%1 Apr
nuke13–70.0858%30 Mar
mirage13–30.1252%30 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0325%25 Mar
vertigo13–6-0.0150%23 Mar
mirage5–130.0652%23 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0336%9 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0636%9 Mar
dust213–6-0.0228%9 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0721%9 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0337%3 Mar
mirage13–1-0.0355%19 Jan
dust213–20.0223%19 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0538%19 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0224%12 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0350%24 Dec
dust213–50.0234%24 Dec
dust212–12-0.0034%24 Dec
nuke3–13-0.0932%24 Dec
overpass13–8-0.0432%21 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0421%2 Aug
dust212–12-0.0326%2 Aug
dust21–13-0.0336%16 Jul
dust28–130.0331%15 Jul
nuke13–80.0023%25 May
mirage13–9-0.0332%22 May
mirage10–13-0.0034%18 May
mirage11–130.0218%3 May
inferno13–110.1829%25 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0332%24 Apr
train12–120.0029%24 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0122%11 Apr
mirage9–130.0332%11 Apr
dust213–60.1733%9 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0033%5 Apr
dust216–14-0.0519%30 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0235%28 Mar
dust213–110.0127%23 Mar
mirage4–13-0.1418%23 Mar
mirage12–120.0140%22 Mar
vertigo7–13-0.0213%7 Mar
mirage3–11-0.0427%3 Mar
mirage11–10.0817%22 Feb
dust216–140.0231%21 Feb
mirage13–110.0138%17 Feb
dust29–13-0.0845%29 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0525%29 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0534%26 Jan
mirage13–110.0321%27 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0327%24 Dec
mirage16–130.0333%23 Dec
vertigo13–90.0118%23 Dec
vertigo13–10-0.0026%23 Dec
ancient13–11-0.0517%23 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →