arthixzz. — CS2 Stats

76561199017287258[U:1:1057021530]✓ No bans

2,143Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,271Purple band · top ~23.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28376 of 50785 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,139 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGarthixzz.FACEITLevel 6 · 1,139 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,271 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning42
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45541Last 10045%Win rateLLLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression4.3
Utility6.9
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.2
Utility6.9
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time536ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–6
131Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 24anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A24141058%-0.01
infernoB21101148%0.01
mirageB168850%-0.00
nukeD1551033%-0.02
cacheC114736%-0.03
ancientC73443%-0.00
anubisD51420%-0.00
overpass1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,688Matches
49%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
76.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno35260%1.1715.7
Dust229245%1.0615.6
Mirage22139%1.0014.7
Nuke20751%1.0715.6
Anubis3933%0.9012.7
Ancient3540%0.8912.9
Train1346%1.0016.3
Cache1242%0.8914.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
541msReaction time
15.0%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
8.77HE damage / grenade
13.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.9527% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0018%30 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0414%30 Aug
inferno13–160.039%28 Aug
ancient6–130.0214%26 Aug
dust213–90.0526%26 Aug
mirage16–140.0019%26 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0424%25 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0215%24 Aug
cache9–130.0133%24 Aug
cache3–13-0.0223%23 Aug
ancient5–130.0618%23 Aug
dust21–13-0.0518%23 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0221%22 Aug
nuke13–110.0914%22 Aug
mirage13–70.0326%19 Aug
dust213–100.0021%19 Aug
ancient13–30.0135%19 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0620%16 Aug
inferno5–130.0227%16 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0112%15 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0019%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0121%14 Aug
dust212–16-0.0418%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0121%13 Aug
dust29–13-0.0128%13 Aug
dust23–13-0.0342%12 Aug
anubis13–70.0420%12 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0115%11 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0218%10 Aug
cache16–13-0.0529%10 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0817%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0118%7 Aug
dust27–130.0019%7 Aug
inferno11–130.0625%7 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0338%6 Aug
dust213–9-0.0615%5 Aug
anubis4–130.0523%5 Aug
cache4–13-0.1114%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0333%3 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0812%1 Aug
cache10–130.0230%31 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0015%31 Jul
inferno6–13-0.1033%30 Jul
inferno13–90.0516%30 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0412%30 Jul
inferno13–110.0411%29 Jul
mirage13–20.0019%29 Jul
inferno11–130.0316%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0319%27 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0317%27 Jul
dust213–40.0720%27 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0021%26 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0724%26 Jul
cache4–13-0.1115%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0513%25 Jul
mirage13–60.0221%25 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0011%24 Jul
cache13–10.0919%24 Jul
cache9–13-0.0821%21 Jul
dust213–9-0.0332%20 Jul
mirage10–130.0119%20 Jul
dust219–17-0.0016%20 Jul
cache13–10-0.0118%19 Jul
dust213–70.0517%19 Jul
dust213–160.0322%18 Jul
dust213–20.0720%18 Jul
inferno10–130.0221%17 Jul
mirage13–60.1015%15 Jul
dust213–110.0019%15 Jul
mirage4–130.0821%15 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0710%14 Jul
dust25–13-0.0721%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0222%14 Jul
dust213–10-0.0022%9 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1021%9 Jul
anubis8–130.0119%8 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0510%7 Jul
inferno13–30.0214%5 Jul
dust213–11-0.0421%5 Jul
dust29–130.0131%2 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0113%1 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0713%30 Jun
inferno14–160.0516%30 Jun
inferno13–60.0217%13 Jun
inferno7–130.0142%11 Jun
nuke13–110.0428%11 Jun
inferno13–40.0626%10 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0714%6 Jun
inferno13–70.0817%9 May
cache10–13-0.0724%7 May
cache13–60.0019%28 Apr
dust216–140.0134%28 Apr
nuke13–16-0.0518%25 Apr
inferno13–80.0621%12 Apr
dust216–14-0.0112%11 Apr
inferno13–9-0.019%11 Apr
nuke13–50.035%6 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0113%4 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0936%4 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0228%3 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →