Johno — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198996039407[U:1:1035773679]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,376Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.2 Developing

Premier CS Rating10,547Blue band · top ~52% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11958 of 16422 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46

Positioning41

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6

Aggression3.0

Utility6.4

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6

Positioning4.1

Utility6.4

Mechanics3.8

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time589ms−65ms

first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms

Headshot accuracy13.5%−4.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — nuke 13–4

13–2Biggest win — nuke

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 45% over 33

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	33	15–18	45%	0.00
mirage	B	21	10–11	48%	0.01
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	0.03
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	0.00
cache	S	9	6–3	67%	0.02
anubis	S	6	4–2	67%	0.02
ancient	—	4	4–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 33). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

50Matches

50%Win rate

0.72Avg K/D

59.9ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	10	50%	0.65	10.0
Dust2	10	60%	0.72	10.4
Mirage	9	22%	0.58	9.9
Inferno	8	50%	0.85	13.8
Ancient	5	60%	0.83	11.0
Anubis	3	33%	0.49	8.0
Train	3	67%	0.84	9.3
Overpass	1	100%	1.25	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy

32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.9%Spray accuracy

67.2%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

588msReaction time

28.8%T opening success

28.2%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

10.5%Flash assists

10.24HE damage / grenade

7.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.1682% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.797% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	0.02	6%	28 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	6%	28 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.05	20%	26 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	16%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	13%	26 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	4%	26 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	7%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.02	9%	25 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.00	10%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.05	18%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	7%	24 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	16%	24 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.03	18%	24 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	25%	24 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.02	26%	24 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	16%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.06	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	9%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	15%	23 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	12%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	14%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	16%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	13%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	8%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	13%	22 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.04	9%	22 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	16%	21 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	8%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.05	10%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.06	12%	21 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	22%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	17%	21 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	19%	20 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	9%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.09	14%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.18	13%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.08	13%	20 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.01	7%	19 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.13	13%	19 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.04	11%	19 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	27%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	16%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.02	20%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	23%	17 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	6%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.08	26%	16 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.05	22%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	18%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	23%	16 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.03	21%	16 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	12%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	23%	14 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.00	12%	14 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	7%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.08	20%	14 Aug →
dust2	16–13	-0.01	24%	14 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	16%	14 Aug →
dust2	1–8	-0.03	18%	13 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	23%	13 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.09	22%	13 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	14%	13 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	12%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	17%	12 Aug →
mirage	12–1	0.05	0%	12 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	10%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	12%	12 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	21%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	22%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.00	9%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	25%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.04	13%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	18%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.05	31%	6 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	12%	6 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.04	17%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	23%	5 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	11%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	19%	5 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	36%	5 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	8%	4 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.01	20%	4 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.08	11%	4 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.05	22%	4 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.03	27%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.07	11%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	20%	4 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	8%	4 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	15%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	16%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	20%	3 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	4%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	12%	3 Aug →
mirage	1–11	0.02	24%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.28	34%	2 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.03	17%	2 Aug →