stefanko — CS2 Stats

76561198989259803[U:1:1028994075]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,465Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.7 Developing

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,165 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning50

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–52–5Last 10043%Win rateWWLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression5.1

Utility5.3

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning5.0

Utility5.3

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time648ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms

Headshot accuracy17.3%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — nuke 9–0

13–3Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	D	29	8–21	28%	-0.03
inferno	B	22	10–12	45%	-0.03
ancient	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.02
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.00
anubis	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.02
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	0.00
dust2	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.04
overpass	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.03
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.07
poseidon	—	2	2–0	100%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,334Matches

49%Win rate

0.88Avg K/D

65.6ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	325	43%	0.86	12.1
Ancient	218	55%	0.88	13.7
Inferno	195	52%	0.80	12.0
Nuke	141	48%	0.79	12.2
Dust2	44	45%	1.08	15.0
Anubis	29	41%	0.97	14.4
Overpass	21	33%	0.62	11.4
Train	13	54%	0.86	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.3%Spray accuracy

79.0%Counter-strafing

11.7°Preaim

649msReaction time

29.3%T opening success

46.7%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

10.7%Flash assists

9.47HE damage / grenade

6.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.3393% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–8	-0.01	7%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.06	21%	20 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	27%	20 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	23%	19 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.02	22%	19 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.03	21%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	16%	13 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	16%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	11%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	13%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.04	20%	12 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	8%	12 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	11%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	22%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	17%	10 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	15%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.00	14%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.05	11%	10 Aug →
anubis	19–16	-0.03	18%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.00	16%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.06	17%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	20%	3 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	9%	3 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	19%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.08	21%	31 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.05	24%	31 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	33%	29 Jul →
inferno	16–12	-0.00	21%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	20%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	21%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.00	13%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.06	8%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	16%	15 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.00	13%	13 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.05	11%	10 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	15%	7 Jul →
cache	19–15	0.03	17%	7 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	15%	29 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	15%	29 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.08	11%	29 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	8%	28 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	6%	25 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	14%	22 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	13%	22 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	26%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	9%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	19%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	8%	4 Jun →
ancient	16–14	-0.07	2%	4 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	19%	1 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	15%	1 Jun →
overpass	13–5	-0.06	4%	28 May →
mirage	11–13	0.00	18%	28 May →
nuke	8–8	-0.10	15%	24 May →
vertigo	2–9	-0.16	18%	24 May →
inferno	0–9	-0.28	22%	24 May →
poseidon	9–6	-0.01	7%	24 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	9%	23 May →
mirage	16–14	-0.05	14%	23 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.12	11%	23 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	11%	22 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	14%	22 May →
inferno	13–9	0.01	15%	20 May →
ancient	3–13	0.00	22%	20 May →
mirage	11–13	0.02	10%	20 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.07	16%	19 May →
cache	11–13	-0.02	22%	19 May →
mirage	10–13	0.02	23%	18 May →
ancient	8–13	0.04	22%	18 May →
inferno	13–16	0.03	11%	18 May →
ancient	13–11	0.02	13%	18 May →
poseidon	9–7	0.02	23%	16 May →
overpass	9–6	-0.04	4%	16 May →
nuke	9–0	0.26	21%	16 May →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	8%	16 May →
vertigo	9–1	0.02	6%	16 May →
mirage	12–16	0.01	15%	16 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	20%	15 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	11%	15 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	14%	15 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	18%	15 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	15%	14 May →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	12%	14 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	7%	10 May →
overpass	13–11	0.01	9%	9 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	24%	6 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	21%	6 May →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	19%	6 May →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	31%	6 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	20%	3 May →
cache	11–13	-0.04	27%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.06	11%	29 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	18%	27 Apr →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	19%	27 Apr →
inferno	7–13	-0.09	17%	27 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	16%	26 Apr →
mirage	15–15	-0.06	15%	23 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.01	20%	23 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.12	19%	23 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	17%	22 Apr →