Fac3mask™

Fac3mask™ — CS2 Stats

76561198985309991[U:1:1025044263]Steam profile ↗

3,781Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,793Purple band · top ~17.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8859 of 15967 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,228 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFac3mask™FACEITLevel 6 · 1,228 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,793 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning50
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateWWLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression6.7
Utility5.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.0
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time626ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%+4.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — anubis 13–5
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 14infernoWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC31131842%0.00
infernoD1551033%-0.00
dust2A149564%0.01
nukeA138562%-0.00
anubisB115645%0.02
ancientA95456%-0.02
cacheD62433%0.01
overpass110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,108Matches
50%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
74.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage35150%0.9514.5
Anubis15752%0.9815.2
Ancient13350%0.8614.4
Dust212048%0.9214.4
Vertigo8856%0.9214.4
Inferno8448%0.9314.6
Nuke5845%0.9914.7
Overpass1953%0.9216.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
638msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
9.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8251% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–20.0524%28 Aug
nuke13–70.0431%28 Aug
dust214–16-0.0825%25 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0438%25 Aug
mirage6–130.0423%23 Aug
dust213–90.0222%23 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0531%22 Aug
cache11–130.0823%22 Aug
dust213–70.0922%22 Aug
mirage13–40.0324%20 Aug
inferno8–130.0233%20 Aug
mirage10–130.0119%20 Aug
mirage11–130.0326%19 Aug
dust213–60.0431%16 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0817%16 Aug
mirage6–130.0229%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0223%14 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0122%14 Aug
cache13–80.0230%12 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0218%12 Aug
anubis13–60.0230%12 Aug
mirage13–30.1022%12 Aug
dust213–20.0230%9 Aug
cache10–130.0530%9 Aug
mirage13–60.0711%9 Aug
nuke13–40.0435%9 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0022%8 Aug
inferno13–100.0234%7 Aug
nuke16–130.0615%7 Aug
cache14–16-0.0518%6 Aug
anubis14–160.0018%6 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0014%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0523%3 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0021%3 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0125%26 Jul
anubis13–50.1025%26 Jul
inferno13–80.0317%25 Jul
mirage13–70.0625%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0417%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0832%19 Jul
nuke16–140.0322%19 Jul
inferno7–130.0126%18 Jul
dust213–50.1015%18 Jul
dust28–130.0724%18 Jul
cache10–13-0.0129%17 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0020%17 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0713%17 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0517%12 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1117%12 Jul
mirage13–70.1223%11 Jul
dust213–100.0320%11 Jul
cache13–2-0.0127%11 Jul
mirage12–160.0320%5 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0028%5 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0621%3 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0119%3 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0215%26 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0312%26 Jan
dust213–10-0.0323%26 Jan
ancient13–70.0220%26 Jan
nuke15–150.0229%26 Jan
overpass13–80.0111%26 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0512%25 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0815%25 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0217%24 Jan
mirage13–110.0722%24 Jan
anubis3–8-0.0419%23 Jan
anubis16–130.0623%23 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0331%23 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0512%22 Jan
dust29–13-0.0112%22 Jan
anubis13–50.1324%22 Jan
mirage13–70.0421%20 Jan
mirage7–130.0630%20 Jan
anubis13–110.0021%19 Jan
dust28–13-0.1021%19 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0120%18 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0611%18 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0227%18 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0520%17 Jan
mirage7–130.0215%17 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0522%15 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0315%14 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0614%14 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0330%13 Jan
dust216–14-0.0218%13 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0417%12 Jan
nuke10–130.0017%12 Jan
inferno13–3-0.0116%12 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0318%11 Jan
inferno15–150.0122%11 Jan
dust216–120.0612%10 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0225%10 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0619%9 Jan
ancient19–17-0.0216%7 Jan
inferno13–110.0121%7 Jan
inferno14–160.0416%6 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0825%5 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0123%5 Jan
ancient13–50.0419%5 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →