RiFT — CS2 Stats

76561198980295550[U:1:1020029822]✓ No bans

2,937Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,053 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRiFTFACEITLevel 10 · 3,053 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning60
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58411Last 10058%Win rateLWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4
Aggression8.0
Utility4.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time562ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — anubis 13–2
131Biggest win — overpass
7Longest win streak
1310In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25151060%0.02
dust2A1912763%-0.00
ancientC146843%0.00
nukeA127558%0.03
anubisS86275%0.04
overpassB84450%0.00
infernoC52340%0.01
train43175%0.02
poseidon32167%0.02
vertigo1010%0.03
grail110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,661Matches
54%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
86.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage31853%1.1217.7
Ancient25556%1.1817.3
Anubis15350%1.0716.5
Dust213846%1.1317.7
Nuke9352%1.1117.1
Overpass4760%1.0917.6
Inferno4349%0.9415.4
Vertigo2540%0.9916.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
537msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
66.6%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
10.8%Flash assists
6.31HE damage / grenade
7.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8388% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0115%26 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0119%24 Aug
nuke16–140.1324%24 Aug
dust216–120.0123%21 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0128%23 Jun
mirage13–90.0429%16 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0030%9 Jun
poseidon9–30.0832%11 May
poseidon5–9-0.0732%11 May
dust213–100.0036%27 Apr
inferno8–80.1133%27 Apr
poseidon9–70.0426%27 Apr
vertigo7–130.0327%26 Apr
mirage13–80.0330%4 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0031%4 Mar
dust213–11-0.0818%3 Mar
dust213–11-0.0523%3 Mar
dust211–130.0132%3 Mar
inferno7–9-0.0841%2 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0216%2 Mar
mirage16–13-0.0118%24 Feb
overpass2–13-0.0214%24 Feb
mirage13–90.0229%17 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0228%17 Feb
mirage13–90.1320%17 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0129%17 Feb
ancient13–50.0729%11 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0229%4 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0233%3 Feb
mirage16–130.0442%2 Feb
mirage13–100.0421%2 Feb
dust216–140.0727%29 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0123%20 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0623%20 Jan
anubis13–20.1436%19 Jan
train3–13-0.0725%13 Jan
anubis16–140.0726%12 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0421%10 Dec
overpass7–130.0019%6 Dec
mirage13–100.0637%5 Dec
mirage11–130.0135%4 Dec
overpass8–130.0123%1 Dec
dust24–130.0226%29 Nov
mirage16–14-0.0126%25 Nov
train13–70.0437%24 Nov
mirage13–110.0226%19 Nov
train13–100.0135%15 Nov
nuke9–130.0333%11 Nov
ancient5–130.0537%10 Nov
mirage19–160.0427%10 Nov
overpass16–130.0025%9 Nov
mirage19–170.1039%1 Nov
dust216–140.0032%31 Oct
dust213–100.0331%29 Oct
overpass13–50.0744%29 Oct
inferno13–100.0127%29 Oct
inferno14–16-0.0222%28 Oct
ancient16–140.0828%25 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0226%25 Sept
dust26–13-0.0327%23 Sept
dust213–80.0738%19 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0617%16 Sept
overpass14–16-0.0434%12 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0744%11 Sept
mirage13–100.0727%9 Sept
nuke13–110.0029%2 Sept
mirage17–190.0327%2 Sept
overpass13–70.0823%2 Sept
inferno13–80.0224%25 Aug
mirage17–19-0.0120%30 Jul
overpass13–1-0.0835%28 Jul
nuke13–100.0113%17 Jul
mirage10–130.0230%7 Jul
nuke22–19-0.0117%7 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0319%30 Jun
ancient13–70.0241%27 Jun
dust213–70.0522%26 Jun
nuke13–20.0535%26 Jun
dust23–13-0.0533%23 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0019%23 Jun
ancient13–90.0521%11 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0524%10 Jun
dust211–13-0.0037%10 Jun
anubis13–100.0327%9 Jun
ancient7–130.0530%6 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0650%6 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0220%3 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0314%3 Jun
dust27–13-0.0422%3 Jun
dust213–10-0.0540%1 Jun
train13–50.0951%31 May
nuke13–90.0928%28 May
dust213–9-0.0121%28 May
mirage3–130.0414%28 May
nuke13–70.0939%24 May
grail13–100.0627%10 May
ancient13–60.0011%7 May
nuke4–130.0732%30 Apr
dust213–110.0321%30 Apr
anubis13–50.1226%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →